-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
Implementing delete repository function #126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Code Review Completed! 🔥The code review was successfully completed based on your current configurations. Kody Guide: Usage and ConfigurationInteracting with Kody
Current Kody ConfigurationReview OptionsThe following review options are enabled or disabled:
|
const repositoryExists = codeReviewConfigValue.repositories?.some( | ||
(repository: any) => repository.id === repositoryId, | ||
); | ||
|
||
if (!repositoryExists) { | ||
throw new Error('Repository not found in configuration'); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Remover o repositório específico do array | ||
const updatedRepositories = codeReviewConfigValue.repositories.filter( | ||
(repository: any) => repository.id !== repositoryId, | ||
); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
const repositoryExists = codeReviewConfigValue.repositories?.some(
(repository: { id: string }) => repository.id === repositoryId,
);
if (!repositoryExists) {
throw new Error('Repository not found in configuration');
}
// Remover o repositório específico do array
const updatedRepositories = codeReviewConfigValue.repositories.filter(
(repository: { id: string }) => repository.id !== repositoryId,
);
The code uses any
as the type for repository objects when iterating through codeReviewConfigValue.repositories
. Using any
bypasses TypeScript's type checking, which can lead to runtime errors and makes the code harder to understand and maintain. It's recommended to define a specific interface or type for the repository object and use it in the .some()
and .filter()
methods. This will improve type safety and code clarity.
Kody Rules Violation: Evitar uso de any
Talk to Kody by mentioning @kody
Was this suggestion helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to help Kody learn from this interaction.
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ | |||
import { CopyCodeReviewParameterUseCase } from './copy-code-review-parameter.use-case'; | |||
import { CreateOrUpdateParametersUseCase } from './create-or-update-use-case'; | |||
import { DeleteRepositoryCodeReviewParameterUseCase } from './delete-repository-code-review-parameter.use-case'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
import { DeleteRepositoryCodeReviewParameterUseCase } from './deleteRepositoryCodeReviewParameter.useCase';
The Kody Rules require that all new files follow the camelCase naming convention. The newly imported file 'delete-repository-code-review-parameter.use-case.ts' uses kebab-case. Please rename the file to 'deleteRepositoryCodeReviewParameter.useCase.ts' and update the import path accordingly to maintain consistency across the codebase.
Kody Rules Violation: Seguir padrão de nomenclatura de arquivos
Talk to Kody by mentioning @kody
Was this suggestion helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to help Kody learn from this interaction.
@Post('/delete-repository-code-review-parameter') | ||
public async deleteRepositoryCodeReviewParameter( | ||
@Body() | ||
body: DeleteRepositoryCodeReviewParameterDto, | ||
) { | ||
return this.deleteRepositoryCodeReviewParameterUseCase.execute(body); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Delete('/delete-repository-code-review-parameter')
public async deleteRepositoryCodeReviewParameter(
@Body()
body: DeleteRepositoryCodeReviewParameterDto,
): Promise<unknown> {
return this.deleteRepositoryCodeReviewParameterUseCase.execute(body);
}
The endpoint /delete-repository-code-review-parameter
uses the POST
HTTP method for a deletion operation. According to REST principles, DELETE
is the appropriate method for deleting resources. It's recommended to change @Post
to @Delete
. Additionally, the function is missing an explicit return type, which is required by our coding standards. An explicit Promise<unknown>
return type has been added to comply with this rule.
Kody Rules Violation: Tipagem explícita de parâmetros e retornos
Talk to Kody by mentioning @kody
Was this suggestion helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to help Kody learn from this interaction.
import { IsString } from 'class-validator'; | ||
|
||
export class DeleteRepositoryCodeReviewParameterDto { | ||
@IsString() | ||
repositoryId: string; | ||
|
||
@IsString() | ||
teamId: string; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
import { IsString, IsNotEmpty } from 'class-validator';
export class DeleteRepositoryCodeReviewParameterDto {
@IsString()
@IsNotEmpty()
readonly repositoryId: string;
@IsString()
@IsNotEmpty()
readonly teamId: string;
}
The @IsString()
decorator allows empty strings. For more robust validation, consider adding the @IsNotEmpty()
decorator. Additionally, properties in a DTO that are not meant to be changed after initialization should be marked as readonly
to enforce immutability, as per company guidelines.
Talk to Kody by mentioning @kody
Was this suggestion helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to help Kody learn from this interaction.
import { IsString } from 'class-validator'; | ||
|
||
export class DeleteRepositoryCodeReviewParameterDto { | ||
@IsString() | ||
repositoryId: string; | ||
|
||
@IsString() | ||
teamId: string; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
// filename: deleteRepositoryCodeReviewParameter.dto.ts
import { IsString } from 'class-validator';
export class DeleteRepositoryCodeReviewParameterDto {
@IsString()
repositoryId: string;
@IsString()
teamId: string;
}
The filename 'delete-repository-code-review-parameter.dto.ts' uses kebab-case. According to the Kody Rules, all new files must follow the camelCase naming convention. Please rename the file to 'deleteRepositoryCodeReviewParameter.dto.ts'.
Kody Rules Violation: Seguir padrão de nomenclatura de arquivos
Talk to Kody by mentioning @kody
Was this suggestion helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to help Kody learn from this interaction.
This pull request introduces a new feature to the
kodus-ai
repository, specifically implementing a delete repository function. The changes are made in thefeat/delete-repository-config-button
branch and are intended to be merged into themain
branch.Key changes include:
New Use Case: A new use case,
DeleteRepositoryCodeReviewParameterUseCase
, is added to handle the deletion of a repository from a code review configuration. The logic involves fetching the configuration, removing the specified repository, and updating the configuration. Suggestions for improvement include adding null checks, using specific types instead ofany
, and translating comments to English.Use Case Integration: The new use case is integrated into the system by importing it and adding it to the
UseCases
export array in theindex.ts
file.New Endpoint: A new endpoint is introduced in the
parameters.controller.ts
file to facilitate the deletion of repository code review parameters. The implementation is consistent with existing patterns, with a recommendation to align the endpoint with RESTful API design principles.Data Transfer Object (DTO): A new DTO,
DeleteRepositoryCodeReviewParameterDto
, is created to manage the parameters required for deleting a repository code review. It includesrepositoryId
andteamId
properties with basic string validation.Overall, this pull request enhances the functionality of the application by allowing users to delete repositories from code review configurations, with considerations for improving code robustness and maintainability.