Skip to content

KTOR-7584 Moved experimental htmx annotation to a common type #4883

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bjhham
Copy link
Contributor

@bjhham bjhham commented May 26, 2025

Subsystem
Shared, HTMX

Motivation
KTOR-7584 First-class HTMX support

I realized having a specific flag doesn't make sense since we can't remove it without breaking the API.

Solution
Moved the annotation to a common type so we can mark other things as such when we want to solicit some feedback before committing to a stable API.

@bjhham bjhham requested a review from osipxd May 26, 2025 08:33
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 26, 2025

Walkthrough

This change removes the ExperimentalHtmxApi annotation from the codebase and replaces its usage with a new, more general ExperimentalKtorApi annotation. The new annotation is introduced in the io.ktor.utils.io package and is applied to all previously experimental HTMX-related APIs. Associated documentation and opt-in annotations in tests are also updated accordingly. No logic or functionality is modified.

Changes

Files/Paths Change Summary
.../io/ktor/server/htmx/HxHeaders.kt
.../io/ktor/server/htmx/HxRouting.kt
.../io/ktor/htmx/html/HxAttributes.kt
Replaced @ExperimentalHtmxApi annotation with @ExperimentalKtorApi on all relevant classes, properties, and functions. Updated imports as needed.
.../io/ktor/server/htmx/HxRoutingTest.kt
.../io/ktor/htmx/html/HxAttributesTest.kt
Changed test @OptIn(ExperimentalHtmxApi::class) to @OptIn(ExperimentalKtorApi::class) and updated imports.
.../io/ktor/htmx/Annotations.kt Removed the ExperimentalHtmxApi annotation class definition.
.../ktor-htmx/api/ktor-htmx.api
.../ktor-htmx/api/ktor-htmx.klib.api
Removed the ExperimentalHtmxApi annotation from public API declarations.
.../io/ktor/utils/io/Annotations.kt Added new ExperimentalKtorApi annotation with documentation and opt-in requirements; updated InternalAPI retention.
.../ktor-io/api/ktor-io.api
.../ktor-io/api/ktor-io.klib.api
Added new ExperimentalKtorApi annotation class/interface to public API declarations.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
ktor-server/ktor-server-plugins/ktor-server-htmx/common/src/io/ktor/server/htmx/HxHeaders.kt (1)

12-47: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Consistent annotation migration across the htmx module.

The annotation changes from @ExperimentalHtmxApi to @ExperimentalKtorApi are correctly applied to all public APIs.

Since this is a breaking change for consumers who opt-in to these experimental APIs, let me verify the migration impact:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for documentation and test updates related to this annotation change

# Test: Look for README or documentation updates mentioning the annotation change
fd -e md -e adoc | xargs grep -l -E "(ExperimentalHtmxApi|ExperimentalKtorApi|htmx.*experimental)"

# Test: Check if tests have been updated to use the new annotation
rg -A 2 "@OptIn\(ExperimentalHtmxApi::class\)"

# Test: Look for migration guides or CHANGELOG entries
fd -i -e md -e txt "changelog|migration|breaking" | xargs grep -l -i "htmx\|experimental"

Length of output: 254


🌐 Web query:

Is there a standard practice in Ktor for migrating experimental API annotations? What should consumers do when experimental annotations change?

💡 Result:

Yes, in Ktor (and Kotlin in general), there is a standard practice for handling experimental API annotations and their migration.

Context

Ktor uses Kotlin's experimental feature mechanism with annotations such as @ExperimentalKtorApi. When an API is marked experimental, it means its behavior, signature, or existence might change in the future. This requires consumers of such APIs to explicitly opt-in by using annotations like @OptIn(ExperimentalKtorApi::class).

Migrating Experimental Annotations

When experimental API annotations change (for example, if they are renamed, replaced, or removed), Ktor encourages the following approach:

  1. Deprecate the old experimental annotation:
    • The old annotation is usually marked with @Deprecated to warn users.
  2. Introduce a new experimental annotation:
    • This new annotation often covers updated contracts or semantics.
  3. Consumers must update their opt-in annotations:
    • Clients need to replace the old opt-in annotations with the new ones to continue using the experimental APIs without warnings.

What Consumers Should Do

  • Track changes in Ktor versions and their experimental annotations. Keep an eye on release notes or migration guides.
  • Update opt-in annotations in your code. For example, if the old annotation was @OptIn(OldExperimentalApi::class), and it changes to @OptIn(NewExperimentalApi::class), update your source accordingly.
  • Refactor as needed based on the new API semantics. The API itself may have evolved, so adapting your code might be necessary.
  • Optionally, keep code backward compatible if supporting multiple Ktor versions, using conditional compilation or separate branches.

Summary

There's no automatic migration for experimental annotations; consumers must manually update their code on annotation changes to align with Ktor’s evolving experimental APIs. This explicit opt-in approach is intentional to make developers aware of and consent to using unstable or changing APIs.

If you'd like, I can help find specific examples or migration notes from recent Ktor versions to illustrate this better. Would you like me to do that?


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Inspect CHANGELOG.md for entries related to htmx experimental annotation migration
grep -n -C2 -E "(ExperimentalHtmxApi|ExperimentalKtorApi|htmx)" CHANGELOG.md

Length of output: 78


Add migration documentation for the experimental annotation change

I’ve verified that the code correctly replaces @ExperimentalHtmxApi with @ExperimentalKtorApi across the htmx module, but I did not find any corresponding updates to guide consumers through this breaking change:

• No entries in CHANGELOG.md covering the annotation migration
• No updates in README or other documentation files
• No deprecation warning on the old ExperimentalHtmxApi annotation

Please add:

  • A CHANGELOG.md entry noting that htmx APIs moved from @ExperimentalHtmxApi to @ExperimentalKtorApi
  • Migration instructions in your documentation (README or a dedicated migration guide)
  • (Optional) Mark the old annotation as deprecated to aid consumer transition
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/ktor-htmx-html/common/test/io/ktor/htmx/html/HxAttributesTest.kt (1)

7-8: Consider using explicit imports instead of wildcards.

While the wildcard imports work correctly, using explicit imports would be more maintainable and clearer about dependencies.

-import io.ktor.*
-import io.ktor.htmx.*
+import io.ktor.ExperimentalKtorApi
+import io.ktor.htmx.HxSwap
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8c878b2 and 59deb40.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • ktor-server/ktor-server-plugins/ktor-server-htmx/common/src/io/ktor/server/htmx/HxHeaders.kt (3 hunks)
  • ktor-server/ktor-server-plugins/ktor-server-htmx/common/src/io/ktor/server/htmx/HxRouting.kt (3 hunks)
  • ktor-server/ktor-server-plugins/ktor-server-htmx/common/test/io/ktor/server/htmx/HxRoutingTest.kt (2 hunks)
  • ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/api/ktor-htmx.api (0 hunks)
  • ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/api/ktor-htmx.klib.api (0 hunks)
  • ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/common/src/io/ktor/htmx/Annotations.kt (0 hunks)
  • ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/ktor-htmx-html/common/src/io/ktor/htmx/html/HxAttributes.kt (1 hunks)
  • ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/ktor-htmx-html/common/test/io/ktor/htmx/html/HxAttributesTest.kt (2 hunks)
  • ktor-utils/api/ktor-utils.api (1 hunks)
  • ktor-utils/api/ktor-utils.klib.api (1 hunks)
  • ktor-utils/common/src/io/ktor/Annotations.kt (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
  • ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/common/src/io/ktor/htmx/Annotations.kt
  • ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/api/ktor-htmx.api
  • ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/api/ktor-htmx.klib.api
🔇 Additional comments (10)
ktor-utils/common/src/io/ktor/Annotations.kt (1)

7-20: Well-structured experimental API annotation.

The annotation is properly defined with all necessary meta-annotations (@RequiresOptIn, @MustBeDocumented, @Retention(AnnotationRetention.BINARY)) and clear documentation about its purpose and usage. This provides a good foundation for marking experimental APIs across the Ktor codebase.

ktor-utils/api/ktor-utils.klib.api (1)

10-12: API definition correctly reflects the new annotation.

The Klib API dump properly documents the new ExperimentalKtorApi annotation with the correct signature and inheritance.

ktor-utils/api/ktor-utils.api (1)

1-3: LGTM! Clean addition of the new experimental API marker.

The new ExperimentalKtorApi annotation interface is properly declared and aligns well with the PR objective of consolidating experimental API markers into a common type.

ktor-server/ktor-server-plugins/ktor-server-htmx/common/test/io/ktor/server/htmx/HxRoutingTest.kt (1)

7-7: Correctly updated to use the new experimental API marker.

The import and @OptIn annotation have been properly updated to use ExperimentalKtorApi instead of ExperimentalHtmxApi, maintaining consistency with the refactoring.

Also applies to: 22-22

ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/ktor-htmx-html/common/test/io/ktor/htmx/html/HxAttributesTest.kt (1)

18-18: Correctly updated to use the new experimental API marker.

The @OptIn annotation has been properly updated to use ExperimentalKtorApi.

ktor-server/ktor-server-plugins/ktor-server-htmx/common/src/io/ktor/server/htmx/HxRouting.kt (2)

7-7: Import correctly added for the new experimental API marker.


16-16: All experimental annotations properly updated.

The @ExperimentalKtorApi annotation has been correctly applied to all public API elements (hx property, hx function, and HxRoute class), maintaining the experimental status while using the new common marker.

Also applies to: 22-22, 32-32

ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/ktor-htmx-html/common/src/io/ktor/htmx/html/HxAttributes.kt (2)

7-7: LGTM!

The import for ExperimentalKtorApi is correctly added to support the annotation changes.


15-24:

✅ Verification successful

Annotation migration looks good.

The consistent replacement of @ExperimentalHtmxApi with @ExperimentalKtorApi aligns with the PR objectives. This consolidation will help avoid future API breakage.

Let me verify that all references to the old annotation have been updated:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that ExperimentalHtmxApi annotation is completely removed from the codebase

# Test: Search for any remaining usage of ExperimentalHtmxApi
rg -A 2 "ExperimentalHtmxApi"

# Test: Check if the old annotation class definition still exists
fd -e kt -e java --exec grep -l "annotation class ExperimentalHtmxApi" {} \;

Length of output: 111


Annotation migration complete

  • Verified with rg and fd that there are no remaining occurrences or definitions of ExperimentalHtmxApi in the codebase.

All references have been successfully consolidated under @ExperimentalKtorApi. No further changes are needed.

ktor-server/ktor-server-plugins/ktor-server-htmx/common/src/io/ktor/server/htmx/HxHeaders.kt (1)

3-3: LGTM!

The import is correctly added to support the annotation migration.

Copy link
Member

@osipxd osipxd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to have such general-purpose annotation 👍

@RequiresOptIn
@MustBeDocumented
@Retention(AnnotationRetention.BINARY)
public annotation class ExperimentalKtorApi
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Btw, we have deprecated io.ktor.utils.io.KtorExperimentalAPI. Probably we should do something with it. Maybe change its deprecation level to HIDDEN?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, and it would be nice to move InternalAPI here and rename it to InternalKtorApi, but it is definitely out of the PR's scope

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, yeah that makes a lot of sense. I didn't know we had a KtorExperimentalAPI already what the heck I wonder why it was deprecated.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I only found this: KTOR-2204. But it gives no details

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe @e5l remembers something

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We decided to avoid using the experimental API naming because of the confusing contract. It's not clear what we mean by experimental. I would avoid using Experimental naming and try clarifying what the consequences of using such an API are.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I'll just un-deprecate the previous annotation instead of introducing the new one. I've created a ticket for renaming the @InternalApi for the next major release so we don't forget.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you explain the reason and how people should decide to opt in this annotation?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, my thinking is that we need some user feedback on the HTMX additions before committing to the API since it's a fairly subjective and unfamiliar framework / workflow. I think anyone interested in Ktor/HTMX ought to try it out since it's not normally used for big applications and future changes should be pretty minor.

@bjhham bjhham force-pushed the bjhham/hx-experimental-flag branch from 8fa268d to 5206cb1 Compare May 27, 2025 10:16
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8fa268d and 5206cb1.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • ktor-io/api/ktor-io.api (1 hunks)
  • ktor-io/api/ktor-io.klib.api (1 hunks)
  • ktor-io/common/src/io/ktor/utils/io/Annotations.kt (2 hunks)
  • ktor-server/ktor-server-plugins/ktor-server-htmx/common/src/io/ktor/server/htmx/HxHeaders.kt (2 hunks)
  • ktor-server/ktor-server-plugins/ktor-server-htmx/common/src/io/ktor/server/htmx/HxRouting.kt (2 hunks)
  • ktor-server/ktor-server-plugins/ktor-server-htmx/common/test/io/ktor/server/htmx/HxRoutingTest.kt (1 hunks)
  • ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/api/ktor-htmx.api (0 hunks)
  • ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/api/ktor-htmx.klib.api (0 hunks)
  • ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/common/src/io/ktor/htmx/Annotations.kt (0 hunks)
  • ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/ktor-htmx-html/common/src/io/ktor/htmx/html/HxAttributes.kt (1 hunks)
  • ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/ktor-htmx-html/common/test/io/ktor/htmx/html/HxAttributesTest.kt (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
  • ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/common/src/io/ktor/htmx/Annotations.kt
  • ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/api/ktor-htmx.api
  • ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/api/ktor-htmx.klib.api
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/ktor-htmx-html/common/test/io/ktor/htmx/html/HxAttributesTest.kt
  • ktor-io/api/ktor-io.klib.api
  • ktor-server/ktor-server-plugins/ktor-server-htmx/common/src/io/ktor/server/htmx/HxHeaders.kt
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • ktor-server/ktor-server-plugins/ktor-server-htmx/common/test/io/ktor/server/htmx/HxRoutingTest.kt
  • ktor-shared/ktor-htmx/ktor-htmx-html/common/src/io/ktor/htmx/html/HxAttributes.kt
  • ktor-server/ktor-server-plugins/ktor-server-htmx/common/src/io/ktor/server/htmx/HxRouting.kt
🔇 Additional comments (2)
ktor-io/api/ktor-io.api (1)

266-267: LGTM! Standard annotation API declaration.

The addition of ExperimentalKtorApi to the public API follows the expected pattern for annotation interfaces in the JVM bytecode representation.

ktor-io/common/src/io/ktor/utils/io/Annotations.kt (1)

28-28: Good improvement: Adding binary retention to InternalAPI.

Adding @Retention(AnnotationRetention.BINARY) ensures the annotation is preserved in compiled bytecode, which is important for tooling and runtime inspection.

Comment on lines +55 to +72
/**
* This API may change in a future release depending on feedback.
*
* If you'd like to provide some feedback regarding the experimental API,
* please reach out to us via one of the channels listed here: [https://ktor.io/support/](https://ktor.io/support/)
*
* Any usage of a declaration annotated with `@ExperimentalKtorApi` must be accepted either by
* annotating that usage with the [OptIn] annotation, e.g. `@OptIn(ExperimentalStdlibApi::class)`,
* or by using the compiler argument `-opt-in=kotlin.ExperimentalKtorApi`.
*/
@RequiresOptIn(
level = RequiresOptIn.Level.WARNING,
message = "This API is experimental. " +
"It could be removed or changed in future releases, or its behaviour may be different."
)
@MustBeDocumented
@Retention(AnnotationRetention.BINARY)
public annotation class ExperimentalKtorApi
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix documentation inaccuracies in the new annotation.

The ExperimentalKtorApi annotation is well-structured, but the documentation contains inaccuracies that should be corrected:

  1. Line 62: References the wrong annotation class in the example
  2. Line 63: Uses incorrect package name in the compiler argument

Apply this diff to fix the documentation:

- * annotating that usage with the [OptIn] annotation, e.g. `@OptIn(ExperimentalStdlibApi::class)`,
- * or by using the compiler argument `-opt-in=kotlin.ExperimentalKtorApi`.
+ * annotating that usage with the [OptIn] annotation, e.g. `@OptIn(ExperimentalKtorApi::class)`,
+ * or by using the compiler argument `-opt-in=io.ktor.utils.io.ExperimentalKtorApi`.
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
/**
* This API may change in a future release depending on feedback.
*
* If you'd like to provide some feedback regarding the experimental API,
* please reach out to us via one of the channels listed here: [https://ktor.io/support/](https://ktor.io/support/)
*
* Any usage of a declaration annotated with `@ExperimentalKtorApi` must be accepted either by
* annotating that usage with the [OptIn] annotation, e.g. `@OptIn(ExperimentalStdlibApi::class)`,
* or by using the compiler argument `-opt-in=kotlin.ExperimentalKtorApi`.
*/
@RequiresOptIn(
level = RequiresOptIn.Level.WARNING,
message = "This API is experimental. " +
"It could be removed or changed in future releases, or its behaviour may be different."
)
@MustBeDocumented
@Retention(AnnotationRetention.BINARY)
public annotation class ExperimentalKtorApi
/**
* This API may change in a future release depending on feedback.
*
* If you'd like to provide some feedback regarding the experimental API,
* please reach out to us via one of the channels listed here: [https://ktor.io/support/](https://ktor.io/support/)
*
* Any usage of a declaration annotated with `@ExperimentalKtorApi` must be accepted either by
* annotating that usage with the [OptIn] annotation, e.g. `@OptIn(ExperimentalKtorApi::class)`,
* or by using the compiler argument `-opt-in=io.ktor.utils.io.ExperimentalKtorApi`.
*/
@RequiresOptIn(
level = RequiresOptIn.Level.WARNING,
message = "This API is experimental. " +
"It could be removed or changed in future releases, or its behaviour may be different."
)
@MustBeDocumented
@Retention(AnnotationRetention.BINARY)
public annotation class ExperimentalKtorApi
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In ktor-io/common/src/io/ktor/utils/io/Annotations.kt around lines 55 to 72, the
documentation for the ExperimentalKtorApi annotation incorrectly references the
OptIn example annotation class and the compiler argument package name. Update
the example annotation from ExperimentalStdlibApi to ExperimentalKtorApi and
correct the compiler argument to use the proper package name for
ExperimentalKtorApi to ensure accurate guidance for users opting into this
experimental API.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants