-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 297
feat(nodepool): add statuses for nodepool drift #2090
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat(nodepool): add statuses for nodepool drift #2090
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: flavono123 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Hi @flavono123. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 15268621110Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Thanks for the contribution! Rather than create a separate controller for tracking this, is it possible to hook into |
5e4d928
to
1ef715a
Compare
/assign @rschalo |
6ec4639
to
a5736c7
Compare
@rschalo i did, counting drifted nodeclaims, just like for nodes. and added setting the condition of nodepool(not sure the counter controller is the right place though) |
// Set condition Drifted | ||
driftedNodeClaimCount := nodePool.Status.Resources[ResourceDriftedNodeClaim] | ||
if !driftedNodeClaimCount.IsZero() { | ||
nodePool.StatusConditions().SetTrueWithReason( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
emitting an event is required too?
a5736c7
to
aee0dc5
Compare
rebased counting drifted nodeclaims in (*Cluster).updateNodePoolResources since (*Controller) resourceCountsFor has removed in #2110 i didnt add testcases for "state", updateNodePoolResources i mean, so just let me know if they are required |
aee0dc5
to
9f4d581
Compare
Signed-off-by: flavono123 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: flavono123 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: flavono123 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: flavono123 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: flavono123 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: flavono123 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: flavono123 <[email protected]>
9f4d581
to
09ce3f8
Compare
Fixes #1785
Description
add two statuses of NodePool about drifts:
print the DriftedNodeClaimCount as a column of result of kubectl get nodepool
How was this change tested?
unit tests are added,
make presubmit
,kubectl get nodepool -owide
on my local k3sBy submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.