Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ speed up container image builds #4289

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mateusoliveira43
Copy link
Contributor

Why the changes were made

When building a container image for different arch than you are on, if --platform=${BUILDPLATFORM} is not in FROM statement in Dockerfile, build will take longer.

On a project I work, we build container images for testing in clusters that can either be amd64 or arm64. So, sometimes the developer is on the same arch they need to build, sometimes not.

docker-buildx could fix the problem, but would build an unnecessary extra arch (for delivering the product, it does make sense to create all archs possible, but for developing, just building teh arch you need make developemt cycle faster).

How to test the changes made

Run docker-build docker-push and docker-buildx commands and check if they still work (and are not slower).

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mateusoliveira43
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign varshaprasad96 for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 4, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 4, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @mateusoliveira43. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

- $(CONTAINER_TOOL) buildx create --name project-builder
$(CONTAINER_TOOL) buildx use project-builder
- $(CONTAINER_TOOL) buildx build --push --platform=$(PLATFORMS) --tag ${IMG} -f Dockerfile.cross .
- $(CONTAINER_TOOL) buildx build --push --platform=$(PLATFORMS) --tag ${IMG} .
- $(CONTAINER_TOOL) buildx rm project-builder
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code was added to ensure it functions as expected, specifically enabling Docker to generate images with support for all the platforms listed above. Could you confirm that everything will continue to work as intended after your changes?

To move forward, could we please add CI tests? We could create a new GitHub workflow (like build) that builds a sample, triggers this target, and verifies that the generated image supports all required platforms. What do you think? Does this make sense?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure, CI approach is good, will see how to create a test for it

Copy link
Member

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 Nov 5, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just want to share with you that it is implemented as it is because, as far as I remember, the suggestion you are making here did not work well. So, for any changes here, we really need to properly ensure and with a CI so that we can ensure that we have no regressions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants