-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 444
[flaky integration test] Scheduler when ClusterQueue head has inadmissible workload sticky workload deleted, next workload can admit #7325
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
/lgtm |
@mimowo: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 4287079d94f7e6cb3eb9531334c9c98fdd2bb7d9
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mimowo, pajakd The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
https://prow.k8s.io/view/gs/kubernetes-ci-logs/pr-logs/pull/kubernetes-sigs_kueue/7325/pull-kueue-test-e2e-main-1-31/1980248809606746112 |
/test pull-kueue-test-e2e-main-1-31 |
@mimowo: new pull request created: #7327 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@mimowo: #7325 failed to apply on top of branch "release-0.13":
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
/kind flake
What this PR does / why we need it:
It deflakes an integration test (analysis of the flaking scenario).
It is safer to use the
FinishEvictionOfWorkloadsInCQ
instead ofFinishEvictionsOfAnyWorkloadsInCq
because the former is waiting in theEventually
block for the workloads to become ready for eviction.Also, the
ExpectMetric
util functions are calling anEventually
inside them. So it makes no sense to have the enclosingEventually
.Updated two tests. Tested by running >100 times in a loop.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #7250
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?