-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 505
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
release-notes: add --skip-first-commit
/-s
option
#3639
release-notes: add --skip-first-commit
/-s
option
#3639
Conversation
--skip-first-commit
/-s
option--skip-first-commit
/-s
option
ba1b1b1
to
268d1d6
Compare
--skip-first-commit
/-s
option--skip-first-commit
/-s
option
268d1d6
to
5a5ba7b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
This option can be used together with `--start-rev` to skip the first commit. This is helpful if the `--start-rev` is a tag which should not be included in the release notes generation. Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <[email protected]>
5a5ba7b
to
45a9b7a
Compare
Rebased to get the CI changes in. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
thanks
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cpanato, saschagrunert, xmudrii The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Looks like Prow doesn't see the LGTM label 👀 |
/lgtm |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
This option can be used together with
--start-rev
to skip the first commit. This is helpful if the--start-rev
is a tag which should not be included in the release notes generation.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
None
Special notes for your reviewer:
None
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?