Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove the dependency-review action #3641

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

xmudrii
Copy link
Member

@xmudrii xmudrii commented Jun 10, 2024

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR removes the dependency-review GitHub Action because it doesn't work well with some packages such as golang.org/x/oauth2. This is often blocking merges to this repository so we have to manually merge PRs. This has been reported to the upstream a few months ago but we didn't receive any feedback as of now: actions/dependency-review-action#736

For the time being, let's remove this action and consider if we can replace it with something else. I'll create a follow up issue for that.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

xref actions/dependency-review-action#736

xref https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/CJH2GBF7Y/p1718018117653269

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

/assign @saschagrunert @cpanato @Verolop @puerco
cc @kubernetes/release-engineering

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. label Jun 10, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. label Jun 10, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject needs-priority sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jun 10, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from jimangel and jrsapi June 10, 2024 12:11
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 10, 2024
@xmudrii
Copy link
Member Author

xmudrii commented Jun 10, 2024

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 10, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 10, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: saschagrunert, xmudrii

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [saschagrunert,xmudrii]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

Closing in favor of #3642

@xmudrii xmudrii deleted the remove-dep-check branch June 10, 2024 13:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants