-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Removing 1.25 jobs #31139
Removing 1.25 jobs #31139
Conversation
/assign @xmudrii @jeremyrickard |
79a0659
to
ef868b3
Compare
ef868b3
to
ff0c095
Compare
I'll rebase soon |
@@ -176,47 +176,3 @@ periodics: | |||
requests: | |||
memory: "9000Mi" | |||
cpu: 2000m | |||
|
|||
- name: ci-kubernetes-e2e-kubeadm-kinder-1-25 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to check with the SIG CL folks if this requires any change in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@xmudrii - do you know who we can reach out to for this?
This job was in the sig-release-1.25-informing
testgrid dashboard which I'm removing in this PR.
Should I just remove it from the dashboard for now instead of removing the entire job?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@neolit123 Can you help with this? ^^
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's OK to either remove these jobs from the dashboards or remove them entirely (since 1.25 is out of support).
the diff SGTM the way it is, right now thanks.
kubeadm maintainers will push a change when the 1.29 branch and dashboards exist (21st of Nov), and that change will also include removal of the 1.25 jobs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for the clarification @neolit123!
ff0c095
to
d5d0241
Compare
d5d0241
to
e4dd06a
Compare
@xmudrii - I think this is ready for another review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @marosset!
/lgtm
/approve
@neolit123 if things look good now can you approve for config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle/OWNERS ? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
e4dd06a
to
a5583f3
Compare
/approve |
Thanks @dims! |
This looks like a real failure, but let's try retesting just in case |
a5583f3
to
d5bf239
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dims, marosset, neolit123, xmudrii The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/test pull-test-infra-unit-test |
Signed-off-by: Mark Rossetti <[email protected]>
d5bf239
to
7714bb3
Compare
/test pull-test-infra-integration |
/hold cancel |
/lgtm |
@marosset: Updated the
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/hold for review from sig-release folks and also 1.25 EOL
Here are the steps I followed for these changes
release-1.25-windows.yaml
,release-1.25-windows-presubmits.yml
,1.25.yaml
sig-release/config.yaml
andsig-windows/config.yaml
My understanding is that currently release jobs must be cleaned up manually based on comments in #29387
In both of the previous examples the next release branch was already created but in this case the 1.29 release branch has not yet been created.