Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update eslint and prettier (major) #360

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 5, 2021

WhiteSource Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
eslint (source) ^7.0.0 -> ^7.0.0 || ^8.0.0 age adoption passing confidence
eslint (source) ^7.30.0 -> ^8.2.0 age adoption passing confidence
eslint-plugin-prettier ^3.4.1 -> ^4.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

eslint/eslint

v8.2.0

Compare Source

Features

  • c9fefd2 feat: report class evaluation TDZ errors in no-use-before-define (#​15134) (Milos Djermanovic)

Documentation

  • c415c04 docs: Use string rule severity in CLI examples (#​15253) (Kevin Partington)
  • 12b627d docs: fix typo in working-with-rules.md (#​15233) (Nitin Kumar)
  • a86ffc0 docs: fix broken anchor in configuration files (#​15223) (Pierre Berger)
  • ee8af5f docs: Link to unit tests from rule documentation (#​15207) (Brandon Mills)
  • 1c0ca3c docs: add ci and perf tags for commit (#​15215) (Nitin Kumar)

Build Related

  • 796587a build: upgrade eslint-release to v3.2.0 to support conventional commits (#​15246) (Milos Djermanovic)

Chores

v8.1.0

Compare Source

v8.0.1

Compare Source

v8.0.0

Compare Source

prettier/eslint-plugin-prettier

v4.0.0

Compare Source

This breaking change drops support for old versions of ESLint, Prettier and
Node. You must use at least ESLint v7.28.0, Prettier v2.0.0 and Node v12.0.0.
Aside from that, usage of this plugin remains identical.

  • v4 - Drop support for eslint 5/6, prettier 1, node 6/8 (#​429) (acb56f3)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: "before 10am on Monday" in timezone Asia/Tokyo.

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner September 5, 2021 15:36
@renovate renovate bot requested review from shinji-hagiwara and im36-123 and removed request for a team September 5, 2021 15:36
@renovate renovate bot added the renovate label Sep 5, 2021
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency eslint-plugin-prettier to v4 chore: update dependency eslint-plugin-prettier to v4 Sep 19, 2021
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-eslint-and-prettier branch from a5a3156 to 42e6c17 Compare October 10, 2021 16:05
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore: update dependency eslint-plugin-prettier to v4 chore: update eslint and prettier (major) Oct 10, 2021
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-eslint-and-prettier branch from 42e6c17 to 200060c Compare October 11, 2021 14:48
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-eslint-and-prettier branch from 200060c to 8ed702f Compare October 24, 2021 15:47
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-eslint-and-prettier branch from 8ed702f to b7c49cf Compare October 31, 2021 16:19
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-eslint-and-prettier branch from b7c49cf to bd1fba3 Compare November 7, 2021 15:44
@diescake
Copy link
Contributor

#374 で対応するので閉じます!

@diescake diescake closed this Nov 11, 2021
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/major-eslint-and-prettier branch November 16, 2021 09:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants