Skip to content

Conversation

@Cristhianzl
Copy link
Member

This pull request updates the src/frontend/package-lock.json file to improve dependency management and compatibility. The main change is the addition of the "peer": true property to a large number of dependencies, which helps npm and other package managers correctly handle peer dependencies. Additionally, a few packages are updated to newer versions.

Dependency Management Improvements

Version Updates

  • Updated the devalue package from version 5.6.1 to 5.6.2 and updated its dependency reference in svelte. [1] [2]
  • Updated the hono package from version 4.11.3 to 4.11.4.
  • Updated the svelte package from version 5.46.1 to 5.47.1.

These changes will help ensure that your project’s dependencies are managed more reliably, reducing the risk of version conflicts and improving compatibility with other packages.

@Cristhianzl Cristhianzl self-assigned this Jan 20, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 20, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • src/frontend/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch cz/audit-fix

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 20, 2026

Frontend Unit Test Coverage Report

Coverage Summary

Lines Statements Branches Functions
Coverage: 18%
17.6% (5044/28644) 10.94% (2417/22084) 11.7% (734/6272)

Unit Test Results

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
2006 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 26.291s ⏱️

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 20, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 34.52%. Comparing base (6f30ed2) to head (b18d38a).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (41.58%) is below the target coverage (60.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #11385      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   34.54%   34.52%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1415     1415              
  Lines       67401    67323      -78     
  Branches     9937     9937              
==========================================
- Hits        23282    23242      -40     
+ Misses      42889    42851      -38     
  Partials     1230     1230              
Flag Coverage Δ
frontend 16.11% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 5 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@viktoravelino
Copy link
Collaborator

lgtm

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Jan 20, 2026
@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 21, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit a7fad24 Jan 21, 2026
27 of 28 checks passed
@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz deleted the cz/audit-fix branch January 21, 2026 14:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ignore-for-release lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants