fix(inputs): default IntInput to 0

[HzaRashid]

set IntInput default value to 0

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

• New Features
  • Integer input fields now include configurable default values for enhanced form initialization and user input management.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

• 🔍 Trigger a full review

Walkthrough

A new public integer field value with a default value of 0 was added to the IntInput class in the inputs module. This attribute is now included in the class's serialized fields and validation flow.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
IntInput Class Enhancement src/lfx/src/lfx/inputs/inputs.py	Added public attribute value: int = 0 to IntInput class, introducing a new integer value field with default initialization

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

---

Important

Pre-merge checks failed

Please resolve all errors before merging. Addressing warnings is optional.

❌ Failed checks (1 error, 1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Test Coverage For New Implementations	❌ Error	The PR introduces a new default value field on IntInput but lacks tests to verify the default behavior works correctly.	Add a backend unit test file (e.g., test_inputs.py) that instantiates IntInput with no explicit value and asserts its value is 0.
Test File Naming And Structure	⚠️ Warning	PR introduces default value of 0 for IntInput but no explicit test case verifies this behavior.	Add test_int_input_default() function to verify IntInput default value equals 0 without explicit value provided.
Test Quality And Coverage	❓ Inconclusive	Unable to access repository files to examine the IntInput class implementation and associated test coverage.	Provide access to the actual test files and confirm the location of the modified inputs.py file to verify test coverage for the new default value.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'fix(inputs): default IntInput to 0' directly aligns with the PR objective and change—adding a default value of 0 to the IntInput class.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
Excessive Mock Usage Warning	✅ Passed	PR modifies only IntInput class field; no test files changed, so excessive mock usage check not applicable.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/intinput-default

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

Frontend Unit Test Coverage Report

Coverage Summary

Lines	Statements	Branches	Functions
	17.54% (5050/28789)	10.96% (2432/22176)	11.63% (733/6299)

Unit Test Results

Tests	Skipped	Failures	Errors	Time
2036	0 💤	0 ❌	0 🔥	26.917s ⏱️

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 34.84%. Comparing base (47f4e80) to head (275a8f4).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #11454   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   34.84%   34.84%           
=======================================
  Files        1420     1420           
  Lines       68200    68188   -12     
  Branches     9981     9977    -4     
=======================================
  Hits        23762    23762           
+ Misses      43213    43202   -11     
+ Partials     1225     1224    -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
backend	54.20% <ø> (ø)
frontend	16.05% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/lfx/src/lfx/inputs/inputs.py	69.55% <ø> (ø)

... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[edwinjosechittilappilly]

code LGTM

[edwinjosechittilappilly]

@HzaRashid please check if it doesnot break the components.