#2 headers's extraction bug removed #3
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Owner
|
Thanks @Sachin-8125 for your contribution! I un-skipped the tests and allowed the pipeline to run. As you see there are still some tests failing. |
Owner
|
Hey there, sorry but I'm closing this in favor of #4 which already resolved the Issue |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
defaultValue was treating headers like a plain object (headers["x-csrf-token"]) while in test, it is a header's instance which return undefined. so valid tokens in headers were missed. So, use headers.get() when headers is a Headers instance.
Added a raw-body fallback in the request hook.