Skip to content

Conversation

@GeorgeTsagk
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Previously we'd define either a single or a double tweak for the sign
descriptor. We introduce the option to apply both consecutively (double
tweak first, single tweak second) if both tweak parameters are set. For
callers who define only one of the two parameters we maintain the old
behavior.

Previously we'd define either a single or a double tweak for the sign
descriptor. We introduce the option to apply both consecutively (double
tweak first, single tweak second) if both tweak parameters are set. For
callers who define only one of the two parameters we maintain the old
behavior.
@GeorgeTsagk GeorgeTsagk self-assigned this Nov 18, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @GeorgeTsagk, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the lnwallet's private key handling by allowing the sequential application of both double and single tweaks to a private key. This provides greater flexibility in key derivation scenarios where both types of tweaks are required, while explicitly defining the order of application to ensure predictable outcomes. The change maintains compatibility with existing implementations that utilize only one type of tweak.

Highlights

  • Combined Private Key Tweak: Introduced the ability to apply both a double tweak and a single tweak consecutively to a private key within the maybeTweakPrivKey function.
  • Defined Tweak Order: When both tweaks are present, the double tweak is applied first, followed by the single tweak, ensuring a consistent derivation process.
  • Backward Compatibility: The existing behavior for applying only a single tweak or only a double tweak remains unchanged, preserving compatibility for current callers.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces support for applying both a single and double tweak to a private key, which is a useful extension. The implementation is correct. I've suggested a refactoring in maybeTweakPrivKey to simplify the logic and improve readability. Additionally, I've noticed that input.ReadSignDescriptor will return an ErrTweakOverdose if it tries to deserialize a SignDescriptor with both tweaks set. If these combined-tweak descriptors are ever serialized and deserialized, this will cause issues. You may want to consider removing that check in input.ReadSignDescriptor as part of this or a follow-up change to ensure consistency with the new behavior.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant