Skip to content

Conversation

@goapunk
Copy link

@goapunk goapunk commented Jul 23, 2024

Describe your changes
Briefly explain what you did and provide context for a clearer understanding.

Tasks

  • PR name contains story or task reference
  • Steps to recreate and test the changes
  • Documentation (docs and inline)
  • Tests (including n+1 and django_assert_num_queries where applicable)
  • Changelog

@goapunk goapunk force-pushed the jd-2024-07-mypy-type-checker branch 3 times, most recently from c165413 to ba43c52 Compare July 25, 2024 07:51
Julian Dehm and others added 9 commits July 25, 2024 13:43
- refactor ParagraphForm.jsx to new django-ckeditor-5 api
- update django-ckeditor-5
- add setting to limit file uploads to 5mb
- extend logic from projects to external projects and plans
- add signal to reset cache when new phases are created
- add and update tests for some more cases
- improve queries with some selecte_related / prefetch_related
- use delay_on_commit for tasks called via signals to prevent race
  condition
- update celery to 5.4.0
- add module publish and unpublish signals to refresh the cache
- add project_component_updated signal to refresh the cache

fixes #5684
@goapunk goapunk force-pushed the jd-2024-07-mypy-type-checker branch from ba43c52 to 7887b38 Compare September 19, 2024 12:36
@goapunk
Copy link
Author

goapunk commented Sep 19, 2024

@m4ra I was playing around with this a while ago when I realized I had added a wrong type hint and thought having a check for it would be nice, but it also means we have to add type hints a lot, so I'm not really sure if it's worth it. What do you think?

@m4ra
Copy link
Contributor

m4ra commented Sep 19, 2024

I am up for it. However this workflow needs 18 fixes for the tests to pass /:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants