Closed
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
hjpotter92
approved these changes
Apr 7, 2025
thomshutt
approved these changes
Apr 7, 2025
Contributor
Author
|
Closing this one, since @victorges found a better solution here: #2333 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We have a problem with PATCH/DELETE multistream target. The issue is that when user has a lot of streams, then this becomes a very DB-heavy request.
The proposed workaround is to skip notifying Catalyst about the multistream update in case of not passing by the user a helper
streamIdorplaybackIdas query param. So it will work right now this way:streamIdorplaybackIdin the query params, then it will work as before.DELETE /api/multistream/target/fabb8085-5d71-4807-919e-abd7410f051bDELETE /api/multistream/target/fabb8085-5d71-4807-919e-abd7410f051b?streamId=abcdefThe root cause is our studio DB architecture and the design decision that 1 multistream can be related to multiple streams. This with comparison with storing everything as JSON and multiple target in a single stream creates the issue: we can only use GIN index, which happens to be too slow with the number of streams users have.