Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add predefined facility fulfillment option #2

Closed
wants to merge 33 commits into from

Conversation

rongboxu
Copy link

@rongboxu rongboxu commented Apr 2, 2023

No description provided.

github-actions bot and others added 11 commits February 25, 2023 14:57
* ruff-en code base

* remove versioneer

* adopt pyproject.toml

* clean up envs, etc.

* update codecov

* test again master and main libpysal (temp)

* only test dev against libpysal@main

* update other dev pins

* add mapclassify, etc. to dev env

* ensure all deps are installed in dev

* re-ruff repo

* ruff based on py39

* ruff based on py38

* resolve typing issues <3.9 [1]

* resolve typing issues <3.9 [2]

* address review comments
updates:
- [github.com/charliermarsh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.0.252 → v0.0.254](astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit@v0.0.252...v0.0.254)

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
updates:
- [github.com/charliermarsh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.0.254 → v0.0.255](astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit@v0.0.254...v0.0.255)

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
updates:
- [github.com/charliermarsh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.0.255 → v0.0.257](astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit@v0.0.255...v0.0.257)

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* address new ruff failures

* proper stacklevel

* update precommit

* revisit stacklevels
updates:
- [github.com/charliermarsh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.0.261 → v0.0.262](astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit@v0.0.261...v0.0.262)

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
updates:
- [github.com/charliermarsh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.0.262 → v0.0.263](astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit@v0.0.262...v0.0.263)

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
updates:
- [github.com/charliermarsh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.0.263 → v0.0.269](astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit@v0.0.263...v0.0.269)

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@rongboxu
Copy link
Author

@ljwolf Hi Levi! I am currently rechecking the code changed in the fulfillment of predefined facility's capacity. The problem is that I find it's hard to separate my code from yours because the options I added are based on the predefined facility section you wrote earlier. In this case, maybe I should still make a pull request directly to you?

@ljwolf
Copy link
Owner

ljwolf commented May 24, 2023

Hey! It's ok to open a new PR directly to pysal/spopt with your extra changes. That PR will have both what I've done and what you've added to it. That's totally ok.

What @jGaboardi wanted is to have your name on the PR as the contributor, instead of mine, regardless of the authors of the individual commits 😄

Does that make sense?

@rongboxu
Copy link
Author

Oh Thank you!!! Now I understand! I will open a new PR when I finish this part!

rongboxu and others added 15 commits May 25, 2023 15:26
* shapely & geopandas version bump

* try resolve windows pytest failure

* channel-priority no longer a valid micromamba arg

* try w/0 min geopandas pin

* drop 3.8 support

* only use pins in min CI env

* bump min scipy

* bump min scikit-learn

* bump min shapely==2.0.1

* py38-MIN ci resolved

* pin pandas in 38
updates:
- [github.com/charliermarsh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.0.269 → v0.0.270](astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit@v0.0.269...v0.0.270)

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@ljwolf
Copy link
Owner

ljwolf commented Aug 16, 2023

I think this should be closed in favour of pysal#387

@ljwolf ljwolf closed this Aug 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants