Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: add unit test for src/config/llm.ts #5753

Conversation

gru-agent[bot]
Copy link

@gru-agent gru-agent bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Trigger Info

Trigger Type Triggered By Source Pull Request Assignment
Auto Rebase arvinxx 5733 Detail

Summary

This PR introduces unit tests for the getLLMConfig function, ensuring robust validation of various environment configurations for LLM services. Key highlights include:

  • Default Configuration: Verifies default values when no environment variables are set.

  • API Key Handling: Tests enabling/disabling services based on the presence of API keys for OpenAI, Azure, Zhipu, Anthropic, and others.

  • AWS Bedrock Support: Validates AWS-specific configurations, including region, access keys, and session tokens.

  • Cloudflare Integration: Ensures proper handling of Cloudflare API key and account ID configurations.

  • Wenxin Support: Tests Wenxin-specific API key handling.

  • Service Disabling: Confirms that services can be explicitly disabled via environment variables.

  • Additional Services: Covers configurations for Google, Minimax, Mistral, and Groq services.

The tests utilize vitest for mocking and assertions, ensuring comprehensive coverage of all supported configurations.

Tip

You can @gru-agent and leave your feedback. TestGru will make adjustments based on your input

Tip

You can @gru-agent rebase to rebase the PR.

Tip

You can @gru-agent redo to reset or rebase before redoing the PR.

Tip

To modify the test code yourself, click here Edit Test Code

@gru-agent gru-agent bot requested a review from arvinxx February 5, 2025 02:33
@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 5, 2025
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 5, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
lobe-chat-database ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 5, 2025 2:54am
lobe-chat-preview ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 5, 2025 2:54am

@lobehubbot
Copy link
Member

👍 @gru-agent[bot]

Thank you for raising your pull request and contributing to our Community
Please make sure you have followed our contributing guidelines. We will review it as soon as possible.
If you encounter any problems, please feel free to connect with us.
非常感谢您提出拉取请求并为我们的社区做出贡献,请确保您已经遵循了我们的贡献指南,我们会尽快审查它。
如果您遇到任何问题,请随时与我们联系。

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.28%. Comparing base (e64d8a3) to head (493cada).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                                               Coverage Diff                                               @@
##           testgru-src-store-user-slices-modelList-selectors-keyVaults.ts-1738674536186    #5753     +/-   ##
===============================================================================================================
  Coverage                                                                         92.28%   92.28%             
===============================================================================================================
  Files                                                                               646      646             
  Lines                                                                             58020    58020             
  Branches                                                                           2713     4076   +1363     
===============================================================================================================
  Hits                                                                              53541    53541             
  Misses                                                                             4479     4479             
Flag Coverage Δ
app 92.28% <ø> (ø)
server 98.01% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants