Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✅ test: add unit test for src/store/aiInfra/slices/aiModel/action.ts #6089

Conversation

gru-agent[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@gru-agent gru-agent bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Trigger Info

Trigger Type Triggered By Source Pull Request Assignment
Auto Rebase arvinxx 6080 Detail

Summary

This PR introduces unit tests for the aiModel slice actions in the AI infrastructure store. The tests ensure the correctness of various functionalities related to AI model management. Key highlights include:

  • Test Coverage for Actions:

    • batchToggleAiModels: Verifies toggling multiple AI models' enabled state and refreshing the model list.

    • batchUpdateAiModels: Ensures batch updates to AI models and subsequent list refresh.

    • clearModelsByProvider and clearRemoteModels: Tests clearing models by provider and remote models, respectively.

    • createNewAiModel: Validates the creation of a new AI model and list refresh.

    • toggleModelEnabled: Confirms toggling a single model's enabled state.

    • updateAiModelsConfig: Tests updating configuration for a specific AI model.

    • updateAiModelsSort: Ensures sorting updates for AI models.

  • Internal State Management:

    • internal_toggleAiModelLoading: Tests adding/removing model IDs to/from the loading state.
  • Mocking and Validation:

    • Mocks aiModelService methods to isolate and test slice logic.

    • Ensures service calls are skipped when no active provider is set.

These tests enhance the reliability of the aiModel slice by verifying its integration with the service layer and internal state updates.

Tip

You can @gru-agent and leave your feedback. TestGru will make adjustments based on your input

Tip

You can @gru-agent rebase to rebase the PR.

Tip

You can @gru-agent redo to reset or rebase before redoing the PR.

Tip

To modify the test code yourself, click here Edit Test Code

@gru-agent gru-agent bot requested a review from arvinxx February 13, 2025 06:18
@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 13, 2025
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 13, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
lobe-chat-preview ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 13, 2025 6:18am

@gru-agent gru-agent bot mentioned this pull request Feb 13, 2025
8 tasks
@lobehubbot
Copy link
Member

👍 @gru-agent[bot]

Thank you for raising your pull request and contributing to our Community
Please make sure you have followed our contributing guidelines. We will review it as soon as possible.
If you encounter any problems, please feel free to connect with us.
非常感谢您提出拉取请求并为我们的社区做出贡献,请确保您已经遵循了我们的贡献指南,我们会尽快审查它。
如果您遇到任何问题,请随时与我们联系。

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 72.41379% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 92.50%. Comparing base (be0d7f6) to head (77cc129).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/database/server/models/aiModel.ts 33.33% 4 Missing ⚠️
src/services/aiModel/client.ts 50.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
src/services/aiModel/server.ts 50.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6089      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.44%   92.50%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         661      661              
  Lines       59979    60005      +26     
  Branches     3021     3024       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits        55448    55506      +58     
+ Misses       4531     4499      -32     
Flag Coverage Δ
app 92.50% <72.41%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
server 97.90% <33.33%> (-0.11%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@arvinxx arvinxx closed this Feb 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants