Add 4 miscellaneous persistence techniques #956
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jorik-utwente
changed the title
mr-tz
reviewed
Nov 11, 2024
mr-tz
reviewed
Nov 14, 2024
Comment on lines
+20
to
+25
| - and: | ||
| - or: | ||
| - match: copy file | ||
| - match: move file | ||
| - match: host-interaction/file-system/write | ||
| - string: /\\spool\\PRTPROCS\\/i |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
with the dynamic: call scope this would only work for static processing, is that intended?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is intended to work for dynamic as well.
When #952 is merged, this should work for dynamic as well (as it changes the scope of copy file, move file, and write file to the call scope).
Or is there another reason why it wouldn't work for dynamic analysis?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add 4 miscellaneous persistence techniques.
The BITS Jobs and WMI subscription rules may result in false positives because of the
ole32.CoCreateInstancematching.We might want to remove that part, but that would result in false negatives. Thoughts on this are welcome! :)
This PR requires #952 to be merged.