docker: Add dockerfile for aarch64 and armhf #20
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We try to use a docker file to build different architecture rootfs with the same compile toolchain before, but it doesn't work. So we split the docker file based on the architecutre to solve this problem. Signed-off-by: utzcoz <[email protected]>
pdsouza
approved these changes
Mar 20, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We try to use a docker file to build different architecture rootfs with
the same compile toolchain before, but it doesn't work. So we split the
docker file based on the architecutre to solve this problem.
I test it with
arm64versionrootfsformarlin, and it works fine.@pdsouza Maybe it needs your help to test
armhf. Thanks.