Skip to content

hints: Fix 't' incorrect place for Blank pass and in Schema #232

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 11, 2025

Conversation

emaxx-google
Copy link
Collaborator

The hint type property should be specified on the hint object, not on the patch. This was incorrectly documented in the Schema and incorrectly used in the Blank pass.

Fix both places and add tests with strict sanity checks.

@emaxx-google emaxx-google requested a review from VitaNuo July 10, 2025 23:45
The hint type property should be specified on the hint object, not
on the patch. This was incorrectly documented in the Schema and
incorrectly used in the Blank pass.

Fix both places and add tests with strict sanity checks.
@emaxx-google emaxx-google force-pushed the hint-blank-fix-t-location branch from bbb8cbe to 4e5f9f1 Compare July 10, 2025 23:54
Copy link
Collaborator

@VitaNuo VitaNuo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@emaxx-google emaxx-google left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review!

@emaxx-google
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Also came up with another regression test.

@emaxx-google emaxx-google merged commit e8dc49a into marxin:master Jul 11, 2025
9 checks passed
@emaxx-google emaxx-google deleted the hint-blank-fix-t-location branch July 11, 2025 19:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants