-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 931
paul/grwth-401-refactor-ai-sdk-v5-beta #5923
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Review or Edit in CodeSandboxOpen the branch in Web Editor • VS Code • Insiders |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Greptile Summary
This PR reorganizes and improves the AI SDK documentation, specifically around the v5 beta release. Key changes include:
- Restructuring documentation by moving AI SDK v5 content from a standalone file into a consolidated section under 'Agentic UIs'
- Adding a permanent redirect from '/docs/frameworks/ai-sdk-v5' to '/docs/frameworks/agentic-uis/ai-sdk#vercel-ai-sdk-v5'
- Standardizing heading levels in model capabilities documentation
- Enhancing migration guidance with specific Mastra considerations for v5 beta
The changes aim to provide a more cohesive documentation structure while maintaining accessibility through redirects.
Confidence score: 5/5
- This PR is a safe documentation update with no impact on production code
- The changes follow best practices for documentation organization and include proper redirects to maintain existing links
- No files need additional attention as all changes are well-documented and properly structured
5 files reviewed, 2 comments
Edit PR Review Bot Settings | Greptile
docs/public/image/mastra-ai-sdk.png
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll create another ticket for adding this back in using the same diagram style that we've started using in Workflows.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This LGTM
Description
Related Issue(s)
Type of Change
Checklist