Solution

[freelinex]

No description provided.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

Review Summary

Great job implementing the calculator's core logic! All the functional requirements are met, and the method chaining works perfectly.

However, one change is needed to align with the project's coding standards. The methods inside your calculator object are defined using arrow functions, but the project requires using the object method shorthand syntax, as mentioned in [CHECKLIST ITEM #3].

For example, instead of this:

add: (a, b) => a + b

Please refactor it to look like this:

add(a, b) {
  return a + b;
}

Once you apply this syntax to all the arithmetic methods, the submission will be ready for approval.

---

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center¹. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Important

Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button² in the Reviewers tab.

Tip

If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag³.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.

Caution

Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.

Footnotes

1. Rate AI review example ↩

2. Re-request AI review example ↩

3. Add AI review comments example ↩

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

This violates checklist item #3: '[CODE KNOWLEDGE] - if you creating a method in the object, you don't need to use function keyword, use shortcut instead.'

While arrow functions are concise, the project requires using the object method shorthand syntax for methods. For example, add: (a, b) => a + b should be written as add(a, b) { return a + b; }.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

Review Summary

Excellent work on this iteration! You've successfully addressed the previous feedback by refactoring your methods to use the correct object shorthand syntax [CHECKLIST ITEM #3]. The code is now clean, fully functional, and meets all the project requirements. I'm approving your solution. Keep up the great work!

---

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center¹. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Footnotes

1. Rate AI review example ↩