fix(ci): reviewdog fix diff issue #34878
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
system
|
Docs for this flag: https://github.com/reviewdog/reviewdog?tab=readme-ov-file#filter-mode |
bsmth
approved these changes
Jul 17, 2024
It works #34879 (comment) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
At the moment reviewdog doesn't report blank lines in GitHub PR checks. For example, consider this test PR. The
lint-and-review-docsworkflow failed but reviewdog didn't make any suggestion.As suggested by a reviewdog maintainer,
-filter-mode=diff_contextfixes it.The code change has been tested here.
After we merge this PR, we'll rebase #34879 and reviewdog should make suggestions about the blank lines.