Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add eslint and improve error handling #1

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

henrycunh
Copy link

what

  • Added bun as package manager
  • Used neverthrow for error handling across functions
  • Switched to ai as common interface for LLM inferences
  • Improved logging implementation to use GH Actions exposed logging utils

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several changes across multiple files, including the addition of a new ESLint configuration file, updates to the package.json file to modify the main entry point and author information, and the introduction of new dependencies. Significant modifications to src/main.ts enhance error handling and logging, with various functions updated to return a Result type for better error management. Overall, these changes aim to improve code structure, linting practices, and dependency management.

Changes

File Change Summary
eslint.config.mjs New ESLint configuration added, importing from @antfu/eslint-config, with custom rules and ignored files specified.
package.json Main entry updated to "dist/src/main.js", author changed to "Henrique Godoy", multiple new dependencies added, and a new dev dependency for ESLint configuration.
src/main.ts Multiple function signatures updated to return Result types, improved error handling and logging implemented, and imports modified to include new libraries.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant App
    participant AIService
    participant Logger

    User->>App: Request AI response
    App->>AIService: Fetch response
    AIService->>App: Return Result<AIResponse, Error>
    App->>Logger: Log response
    App->>User: Send AI response
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
eslint.config.mjs (2)

4-6: Consider using 2-space indentation.

While 4-space indentation is valid, 2-space indentation is more common in modern JavaScript/TypeScript projects and can improve code readability, especially in deeply nested structures. However, this is ultimately a team preference.

 stylistic: {
-    indent: 4,
+    indent: 2,
 },

11-15: Consider using less restrictive rule configurations instead of disabling them.

Given that the PR focuses on improving error handling, consider:

  1. Using warn instead of off for ts/consistent-type-definitions to maintain type consistency
  2. Configuring style/member-delimiter-style with specific options rather than disabling it
  3. Keeping node/prefer-global/process disabled is reasonable for better module independence
 rules: {
     'node/prefer-global/process': ['off', 'always'],
-    'ts/consistent-type-definitions': ['off', 'type'],
-    'style/member-delimiter-style': ['off', 'always'],
+    'ts/consistent-type-definitions': ['warn', 'interface'],
+    'style/member-delimiter-style': ['warn', {
+        multiline: {
+            delimiter: 'semi',
+            requireLast: true
+        },
+        singleline: {
+            delimiter: 'semi',
+            requireLast: false
+        }
+    }],
 },
package.json (1)

16-17: Lock dependency versions for better stability

Consider using exact versions (remove ^) for critical dependencies to ensure consistent behavior across environments.

Example changes:

-    "@ai-sdk/anthropic": "^0.0.56",
-    "@ai-sdk/openai": "^0.0.72",
-    "ai": "^3.4.33",
-    "dedent": "^1.5.3",
-    "neverthrow": "^8.1.1",
+    "@ai-sdk/anthropic": "0.0.56",
+    "@ai-sdk/openai": "0.0.72",
+    "ai": "3.4.33",
+    "dedent": "1.5.3",
+    "neverthrow": "8.1.1",

Also applies to: 20-21, 24-24

src/main.ts (3)

154-164: Avoid logging within error mapper in ResultAsync.fromPromise

In getAIResponse(), logging the error inside the error mapper function of ResultAsync.fromPromise is not recommended, as it may cause side effects during error mapping. It's better to handle logging after the promise has been resolved.

Apply this diff to move logging outside of the error mapper:

const response = await ResultAsync.fromPromise(
    generateText({
        model: resolveModel(),
        system: prompt.system,
        prompt: prompt.user,
    }),
    (error) => {
-       logger.error(`${AI_PROVIDER.toUpperCase()} API error: ${error}`)
        return error as Error
    },
)

if (response.isErr()) {
+   logger.error(`${AI_PROVIDER.toUpperCase()} API error: ${response.error}`)
    logger.error(`Failed to generate text: ${response.error}`)
    return err(response.error)
}

543-545: Use core.setFailed() instead of process.exit(1) in error handler

In the main process's error handler, process.exit(1) is used to exit on error. In GitHub Actions, using core.setFailed() is the recommended way to fail the action and provide error messages.

Apply this diff to use core.setFailed():

main().catch((error) => {
    logger.error(`Error:`, error)
-   process.exit(1)
+   core.setFailed(`Error: ${error.message}`)
})

91-119: Consolidate logging methods to avoid duplication

Currently, the custom logger implementation uses both console.log and core logging methods. This may lead to duplicate logs or inconsistencies.

Consider using only the core logging methods provided by @actions/core for consistency:

info: (message: string, ...args: any[]) => {
-   console.log(`🔍 ${message}`, ...args)
    core.info(`🔍 ${message}`)
},
warn: (message: string, ...args: any[]) => {
-   console.log(`⚠️ ${message}`, ...args)
    core.warning(`⚠️ ${message}`)
},
error: (message: string, ...args: any[]) => {
-   console.error(`❌ ${message}`, ...args)
    core.error(`❌ ${message}`)
},
debug: (message: string, ...args: any[]) => {
-   console.log(`🐛 ${message}`, ...args)
    core.debug(`🐛 ${message}`)
},
success: (message: string, ...args: any[]) => {
-   console.log(`✅ ${message}`, ...args)
    core.info(`✅ ${message}`)
},
review: (message: string, ...args: any[]) => {
-   console.log(`📝 ${message}`, ...args)
    core.info(`📝 ${message}`)
},
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f0cb31 and afc6200.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (9)
  • bun.lockb is excluded by !**/bun.lockb
  • dist/index.js is excluded by !**/dist/**
  • dist/index.js.map is excluded by !**/dist/**, !**/*.map
  • dist/licenses.txt is excluded by !**/dist/**
  • dist/sourcemap-register.js is excluded by !**/dist/**
  • dist/src/main.js is excluded by !**/dist/**
  • dist/src/main.js.map is excluded by !**/dist/**, !**/*.map
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • eslint.config.mjs (1 hunks)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
  • src/main.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
eslint.config.mjs (3)

1-1: LGTM! Good choice of base configuration.

Using @antfu/eslint-config as the base configuration is a solid choice as it provides comprehensive preset rules.


8-10: Please clarify the rationale for disabling parsers.

The configuration disables YAML, JSONC, and regexp parsing features. Could you explain why these parsers are disabled? If there's no specific reason, consider enabling them for better code quality coverage.

#!/bin/bash
# Check for files that might benefit from these parsers
echo "YAML files:"
fd -e yml -e yaml --type f
echo "JSON files:"
fd -e json -e jsonc --type f

7-7: Reconsider ignoring YAML files.

Since the PR mentions improvements to GitHub Actions logging, it might be beneficial to lint YAML files, especially GitHub Actions workflow files, to ensure their quality and consistency.

package.json (1)

16-17: Consider consolidating AI SDKs

You've added multiple AI-related SDKs (@ai-sdk/anthropic, @ai-sdk/openai, ai). Consider if all are necessary to avoid dependency bloat.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential dependency overlap and usage

# Check for SDK usage in the codebase
echo "Checking AI SDK usage..."
rg -l "@ai-sdk/(anthropic|openai)|import.*from 'ai'"

# Check bundle size impact
echo "Checking package sizes..."
npm view @ai-sdk/anthropic size
npm view @ai-sdk/openai size
npm view ai size

Also applies to: 20-20

src/main.ts (1)

295-315: Handle fallback to default rules more explicitly

In fetchCookbook(), when fetching the cookbook fails, the function logs the error and returns defaultRules. This might mask issues when the cookbook is essential for the analysis.

Ensure that falling back to defaultRules is acceptable for your use case. If the cookbook is critical, consider failing the action instead.

package.json Show resolved Hide resolved
package.json Show resolved Hide resolved
src/main.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +475 to +489
logger.error(`Failed to fetch cookbook:`, cookbook.error)
return
}

logger.success(`Cookbook loaded successfully`)

const diff = await getDiff(
prDetails.owner,
prDetails.repo,
prDetails.pull_number,
)

if (diff.isErr()) {
logger.error(`Failed to fetch diff:`, diff.error)
return
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Set action failure status when critical errors occur in main()

In the main() function, when critical operations like fetching the cookbook or the diff fail, the code logs the error and returns without setting a failure status. This may cause the GitHub Action to pass even when it should fail due to these errors.

Apply this diff to fail the action appropriately:

if (cookbook.isErr()) {
    logger.error(`Failed to fetch cookbook:`, cookbook.error)
-   return
+   core.setFailed(`Failed to fetch cookbook`)
+   return
}

logger.success(`Cookbook loaded successfully`)

const diff = await getDiff(
    prDetails.owner,
    prDetails.repo,
    prDetails.pull_number,
)

if (diff.isErr()) {
    logger.error(`Failed to fetch diff:`, diff.error)
-   return
+   core.setFailed(`Failed to fetch diff`)
+   return
}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
logger.error(`Failed to fetch cookbook:`, cookbook.error)
return
}
logger.success(`Cookbook loaded successfully`)
const diff = await getDiff(
prDetails.owner,
prDetails.repo,
prDetails.pull_number,
)
if (diff.isErr()) {
logger.error(`Failed to fetch diff:`, diff.error)
return
logger.error(`Failed to fetch cookbook:`, cookbook.error)
core.setFailed(`Failed to fetch cookbook`)
return
}
logger.success(`Cookbook loaded successfully`)
const diff = await getDiff(
prDetails.owner,
prDetails.repo,
prDetails.pull_number,
)
if (diff.isErr()) {
logger.error(`Failed to fetch diff:`, diff.error)
core.setFailed(`Failed to fetch diff`)
return

Comment on lines +123 to +125
const { repository, number } = JSON.parse(
readFileSync(process.env.GITHUB_EVENT_PATH || '', 'utf8'),
)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure proper handling of GITHUB_EVENT_PATH to prevent exceptions

In getPRDetails(), if process.env.GITHUB_EVENT_PATH is undefined or empty, calling readFileSync('') will throw an error. Additionally, parsing the file content without a try-catch block may lead to unhandled exceptions.

Apply this diff to handle potential errors:

async function getPRDetails(): Promise<PRDetails> {
+   const eventPath = process.env.GITHUB_EVENT_PATH
+   if (!eventPath) {
+       logger.error('GITHUB_EVENT_PATH is not defined')
+       throw new Error('GITHUB_EVENT_PATH is not defined')
+   }
+   try {
        const { repository, number } = JSON.parse(
            readFileSync(eventPath, 'utf8'),
        )
+   } catch (error) {
+       logger.error('Failed to read or parse GITHUB_EVENT_PATH:', error)
+       throw error
+   }
    const prResponse = await octokit.pulls.get({
        owner: repository.owner.login,
        repo: repository.name,
        pull_number: number,
    })
    // ... rest of the code
}

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +392 to +396
if (response.isErr()) {
logger.error(`Failed to generate comprehensive analysis:`, response.error)
return { fileIssues: [], globalIssues: [] }
}
return response.value as unknown as DetailedAnalysis
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Validate AI response before casting to DetailedAnalysis

In getComprehensiveAnalysis(), the AI response is cast to DetailedAnalysis without checking if the structure matches the expected interface. This could lead to runtime errors if the AI provides an unexpected response.

Consider adding validation to ensure that response.value conforms to DetailedAnalysis before casting. This can prevent potential runtime errors.

Apply this diff to add validation:

if (response.isErr()) {
    logger.error(`Failed to generate comprehensive analysis:`, response.error)
    return { fileIssues: [], globalIssues: [] }
}
- return response.value as unknown as DetailedAnalysis
+ const analysisResult = safeParseJSON<DetailedAnalysis>(JSON.stringify(response.value))
+ if (analysisResult.isErr()) {
+     logger.error('Failed to parse AI response as DetailedAnalysis:', analysisResult.error)
+     return { fileIssues: [], globalIssues: [] }
+ }
+ return analysisResult.value

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant