Skip to content

Conversation

Ovewh
Copy link
Collaborator

@Ovewh Ovewh commented Apr 23, 2024

Change Summary

Rather than having a opaque boolean toggle to enable climatology calculation. Which does not really tell what "climatology" means in pyaerocom. To figure that out you need to look at the const. The changes i suggest it to replace the
keyword obs_use_climatology with a dictionary. Where the start stop, data coverage filters and which "year" the climatology should be set can be specified.

Related issue number

fix #1125

Checklist

  • Start with a draft-PR
  • The PR title is a good summary of the changes
  • PR is set to AeroTools and a tentative milestone
  • Documentation reflects the changes where applicable
  • Tests for the changes exist where applicable
  • Tests pass locally
  • Tests pass on CI
  • At least 1 reviewer is selected
  • Make PR ready to review

@lewisblake
Copy link
Member

@Ovewh are you still working on this? Would you like some help? It seems like a nice bit of work which could be useful

@Ovewh
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ovewh commented May 27, 2024

Yea it would be nice with some help... There where more changes required than I envisioned.

@dulte dulte mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2024
9 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

use_obs_clim is broken and has always been: Turns all obsdata into nan

2 participants