Solved the problem of inconsistency between some code snippets in the tutorial07.md file and the corresponding code snippets in the leptjson.c file. #257
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
March 20, 2024 17:51
…gify_value functions in the tutorial07.md file are different from the code snippets of the same functions in the leptjson.c file. The corresponding code snippets in the tutorial07.md file have been changed to the code snippets in the leptjson.c file.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In tutorial07, the code snippets of the lept_stringify and lept_stringify_value functions in the tutorial07.md file are different from the code snippets of the same functions in the leptjson.c file. The corresponding code snippets in the tutorial07.md file have been changed to the code snippets in the leptjson.c file.