Skip to content

Conversation

@taxe10
Copy link
Member

@taxe10 taxe10 commented Nov 14, 2025

Companion PRs:
tomo: mlexchange/mlex_tomo_framework#16
prefect worker: mlexchange/mlex_prefect_worker#26
mlex_utils: mlexchange/mlex_utils#5
highres_seg: mlexchange/mlex_highres_segmentation#201


@taxe10 taxe10 mentioned this pull request Nov 14, 2025
@taxe10 taxe10 requested review from Wiebke and xiaoyachong November 14, 2025 17:11
Copy link
Contributor

@xiaoyachong xiaoyachong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your PR! It looks good. The only potential issue is that it currently has conflicts with the main branch. Could you merge main into your branch and resolve the conflicts on your side? Once that’s done, I can test it together with the other PRs.

@taxe10 taxe10 marked this pull request as ready for review November 21, 2025 16:44
@taxe10
Copy link
Member Author

taxe10 commented Nov 21, 2025

Companion PR: mlexchange/mlex_highres_segmentation#201

Copy link
Contributor

@xiaoyachong xiaoyachong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your PR! I found a few issues with the refactor and left some comments.

Copy link
Contributor

@xiaoyachong xiaoyachong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@taxe10 @Wiebke This PR has been tested on my end alongside the companion PRs, and everything works as expected.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants