-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Supporting a new set methods #3853
Merged
Merged
Changes from 22 commits
Commits
Show all changes
25 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6572115
3850 - if you're using the corepack (https://nodejs.org/api/corepack.…
inoyakaigor eabcdde
3850 - first implementation of new Set methods
inoyakaigor 9763039
3850 - call a method on the argument
inoyakaigor 7131add
3850 - Add code to few another Set methods; align typings to TS PR#57230
inoyakaigor 6b93c8a
3850 - review fixes: move reportObserved() into conditions branch; ch…
inoyakaigor 4e438bb
3850 - add rest of the Set methods
inoyakaigor f5d6863
3850 - align functions parameter type declarations with its expected …
inoyakaigor 46df92b
3850 - update TS to version with new Set methods; remove copied types…
inoyakaigor 4a258c7
3850 - fix type for the «difference» function
inoyakaigor cf22937
3850 - add ESNext to tsconfig lib to fix tests
inoyakaigor a109642
3850 - update TS to Beta
inoyakaigor 4767248
3850 - fix build failing (finally!)
inoyakaigor 538ac5a
3850 - add tests for Set methods
inoyakaigor 30fa622
3850 - change test for Set methods; change source code for methods wh…
inoyakaigor 615b9e7
3850 - bump Nodejs version to 22 because it is support new Set method…
inoyakaigor 68887de
Merge branch 'master' into 3850-new-set-methods
inoyakaigor 7b7317b
3850 – tests for set-like objects
inoyakaigor 74a307a
3850 – tests for check reactivity
inoyakaigor 8ca04e6
3850 – update deps to TS 5.5; remove a packageManager field from pack…
inoyakaigor 5f06ab2
3850 – cancel installation.md changes
inoyakaigor 00d4cc9
3850 – esnext already contains es6
inoyakaigor 81c2329
3850 – change types for new methods and checks for otherSet is has Se…
inoyakaigor 113558b
3850 – review fixes: clarify the types
inoyakaigor 4acd882
3850 – review fixes: removed unnecessary code
inoyakaigor d68dd2a
Merge branch 'main' into 3850-new-set-methods
urugator File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This isn't correct, it won't work with custom enhancer. Was there any problem with the code I've proposed originally? That is:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've checked twice where you mentioned about deleting
reportObserved()
but didn't find. Maybe you're assumed this but I didn't get it. So anyway removing thereportObserved()
throwing errors:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't mention deleting
reportObserved
anywhere, because I didn't propose adding it in the first place:#3853 (comment)
Did you just removed
reportObserved
or did you also replacedthis._data
withthis
as suggested?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I've tought you're mentioned it in your latest messages. Totally forgot about this one! In this case everything is okay