Skip to content

Editorial changes #646

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025
Merged

Editorial changes #646

merged 6 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

martinduke
Copy link
Contributor

More stuff from #643. This is purely editorial IMO.

@martinduke martinduke requested review from afrind and ianswett January 10, 2025 19:51
martinduke added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@afrind afrind left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Individual Review: lgtm

@ianswett ianswett added the Editorial The draft is difficult to understand on a specific point, or it is open to multiple interpretations. label Jan 16, 2025
martinduke added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2025
@ianswett ianswett merged commit 9e6b083 into main Jan 16, 2025
2 checks passed
martinduke added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2025
martinduke added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2025
martinduke added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2025
This reverts commit 7578d11.
@englishm englishm mentioned this pull request Feb 25, 2025
39 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Editorial The draft is difficult to understand on a specific point, or it is open to multiple interpretations.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants