[pickers] looser undefined value comparison #20415
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Explicit `=== null` does not handle when value is `undefined`. using a loose equal (`==`) covers both null and undefined cases, preventing errors in invalid datetimes Signed-off-by: Adam Yost <[email protected]>
localyost3000
changed the title
|
Deploy preview: https://deploy-preview-20415--material-ui-x.netlify.app/ Bundle size report
|
zannager
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Explicit
=== nulldoes not handle when value isundefined. using a loose equal (==) covers both null and undefined cases, preventing errors in invalid datetimesChangelog
Properly handle luxon
isValidcalls when the date value isundefined(eg when a parser likefromIsofails)