Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify which XML attribute of a wheel slot is to be used when #222

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

petrvanekrobe
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

gdtf-spec.md Outdated
| Gobo(n) | MediaFileName |
| Prism(n) | Facet |
| AnimationWheel(n) | MediaFileName |
| AnimationSystem(n) | AnimationSystem |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

together with MediaFileName

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, added

gdtf-spec.md Outdated
If the wheel slot has a prism, it has to have one or several children
called [prism facet](#user-content-prism-facet ). If the wheel slot has an
If the wheel slot describes a prism, it has to have one or several children
called [Prism Facet](#user-content-prism-facet ). If the wheel slot describes an
AnimationWheel, it has to have one child called [Animation
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should be AnimationSystem

@petrvanekrobe
Copy link
Contributor Author

  • Change the SpecialFunction to something better
  • Add optional to the special function
  • Rework the explanation sentence

@petrvanekrobe
Copy link
Contributor Author

  • Open an issue for the builder to do error detection based on the new table
  • We need a new issue for the libMVRGDTF for the "SpecialFunction" attribute

gdtf-spec.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@bbudzon
Copy link
Contributor

bbudzon commented Oct 17, 2024

I gave this another look and I think it looks good @petrvanekrobe!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants