Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Barcode demultiplexing method not to separate multiple sequence runs #1226

Open
erepolliuchi opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 1 comment
Open
Labels
question Issue is a question

Comments

@erepolliuchi
Copy link

Hi,

I sequenced three runs of the same sample using the Native Barcoding Kit SQK-NBD114-96 (same flow cell, but the sequencing had to be stopped unintentionally, so I ended up with three runs).

It is fine up to the point where the pod5 files in 3 separate folders are basecalled into one bam file. But when I dorado demux them, I get 3 x 96 fastq files (= 3 runs x 96 samples). In my case, since the 3 runs are the same sample, I only need 1 run x 96 fastq files, but the run name appears as a prefix at the beginning of the fastq file, and the file is split.

Is there any way to combine these files so that they are not separated by run by using options in the dorado demux command, etc.?

@HalfPhoton
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @erepolliuchi,
I believe you can simply concatenate each of the fastq file triplets as they're just text.

If these we SAM/BAM files you'd need to sort and merge.

Kind regards,
Rich

@HalfPhoton HalfPhoton added the question Issue is a question label Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Issue is a question
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants