Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add benchmark #56

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 30, 2024
Merged

Add benchmark #56

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 30, 2024

Conversation

nao1215
Copy link
Owner

@nao1215 nao1215 commented Apr 30, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a contributors configuration file to manage and display project contributors.
    • Introduced a benchmarking option in the Makefile to enhance performance testing.
    • Implemented concurrency in SQL operations to improve performance.
    • Added a new benchmark test to evaluate the efficiency of importing 100,000 records.
  • Documentation

    • Updated README and CHANGELOG to reflect new features and tests.
  • Refactor

    • Changed target name from test to bench in Makefile for clarity in benchmarking tasks.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 30, 2024

Walkthrough

This update brings a fresh configuration file to manage contributors in the "sqly" project. It includes a new benchmarking target in the Makefile and enhances concurrency in SQL operations using goroutines and sync primitives. Furthermore, a benchmark test for importing records has been added to evaluate performance enhancements.

Changes

File Change Summary
.all-contributorsrc Manages project contributors.
Makefile Added a bench target for benchmarking.
README.md No changes to exported entities.
infrastructure/sql.go Improved concurrency for better SQL performance.
main_test.go Added a benchmark function for record imports.

🐇💻✨
Code hops through fields of syntax,
Where bits and bytes grow,
New benchmarks bloom, like flowers in spring,
Under the watchful eyes of SQL's new kin.
A leap, a sprint, in digital winds! 🌼🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

HOTTEST report

PASS FAIL SKIP TOTAL DURATION
233 0 0 233 1.815415397s

Reported by hottest

Copy link
Contributor

Code Metrics Report

main (4f48ee1) #56 (a961a3f) +/-
Coverage 85.3% 85.6% +0.3%
Test Execution Time 3s 4s +1s
Details
  |                     | main (4f48ee1) | #56 (a961a3f) |  +/-  |
  |---------------------|----------------|---------------|-------|
+ | Coverage            |          85.3% |         85.6% | +0.3% |
  |   Files             |             38 |            38 |     0 |
  |   Lines             |            914 |           931 |   +17 |
+ |   Covered           |            780 |           797 |   +17 |
- | Test Execution Time |             3s |            4s |   +1s |

Code coverage of files in pull request scope (97.6% → 98.3%)

Files Coverage +/-
infrastructure/sql.go 98.3% +0.7%

Reported by octocov

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Comment on lines +48 to +71
indexTypeMap := make(map[int]string, len(t.Header))
semaphore := make(chan int, runtime.NumCPU())
wg := &sync.WaitGroup{}

var mu sync.RWMutex
for i := range t.Header {
wg.Add(1)
go func(i int) {
defer wg.Done()
semaphore <- 1
defer func() { <-semaphore }()
if isNumeric(t, i) {
mu.Lock()
indexTypeMap[i] = "INTEGER"
mu.Unlock()
} else {
mu.Lock()
indexTypeMap[i] = "TEXT"
mu.Unlock()
}
}(i)
}
wg.Wait()

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider simplifying the concurrency model in GenerateCreateTableStatement.

- semaphore := make(chan int, runtime.NumCPU())
- semaphore <- 1
- defer func() { <-semaphore }()
+ // Use a worker pool or other concurrency limiting technique if necessary.

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
indexTypeMap := make(map[int]string, len(t.Header))
semaphore := make(chan int, runtime.NumCPU())
wg := &sync.WaitGroup{}
var mu sync.RWMutex
for i := range t.Header {
wg.Add(1)
go func(i int) {
defer wg.Done()
semaphore <- 1
defer func() { <-semaphore }()
if isNumeric(t, i) {
mu.Lock()
indexTypeMap[i] = "INTEGER"
mu.Unlock()
} else {
mu.Lock()
indexTypeMap[i] = "TEXT"
mu.Unlock()
}
}(i)
}
wg.Wait()
indexTypeMap := make(map[int]string, len(t.Header))
wg := &sync.WaitGroup{}
var mu sync.RWMutex
for i := range t.Header {
wg.Add(1)
go func(i int) {
defer wg.Done()
// Use a worker pool or other concurrency limiting technique if necessary.
if isNumeric(t, i) {
mu.Lock()
indexTypeMap[i] = "INTEGER"
mu.Unlock()
} else {
mu.Lock()
indexTypeMap[i] = "TEXT"
mu.Unlock()
}
}(i)
}
wg.Wait()

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1


* Add unit test for excel [#55](https://github.com/nao1215/sqly/pull/55) ([nao1215](https://github.com/nao1215))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Capitalize "Excel" to refer to the Microsoft software product correctly.

- * Add unit test for excel [#55](https://github.com/nao1215/sqly/pull/55) ([nao1215](https://github.com/nao1215))
+ * Add unit test for Excel [#55](https://github.com/nao1215/sqly/pull/55) ([nao1215](https://github.com/nao1215))

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
* Add unit test for excel [#55](https://github.com/nao1215/sqly/pull/55) ([nao1215](https://github.com/nao1215))
* Add unit test for Excel [#55](https://github.com/nao1215/sqly/pull/55) ([nao1215](https://github.com/nao1215))

@nao1215 nao1215 merged commit 7d639b8 into main Apr 30, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant