NETOBSERV-1786: Add support to build file based catalog

[OlivierCazade]

Description

This catalog will replace the catalog we currently use, for now, we have Makefile target for both.

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

• Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
• Does this PR require product documentation?
  • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
• Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
  • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
• Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
  • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
• QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
  • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
  • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
  • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

[openshift-ci-robot]

@OlivierCazade: This pull request references NETOBSERV-1786 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Description

This catalog will replace the catalog we currently use, for now, we have Makefile target for both.

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

• Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
• Does this PR require product documentation?
• If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labelled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
• Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
• If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
• Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
• If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
• QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
• Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
• Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
• No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.17%. Comparing base (f09ca9b) to head (a1fd4dc).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #728      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.97%   66.17%   +0.19%     
==========================================
  Files          72       74       +2     
  Lines        8383     8561     +178     
==========================================
+ Hits         5531     5665     +134     
- Misses       2454     2498      +44     
  Partials      398      398              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	66.17% <ø> (+0.19%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 16 files with indirect coverage changes

[msherif1234]

just curious why did u added those two new targets since konflux pipeline will use the containerfile directly ?

[OlivierCazade]

We currently have target to build a regular catalog, but if I understand correctly at some point this catalog will be replaced by file based catalog.

I wanted to introduce the new targets without replacing the old ones for now.

[msherif1234]

/lgtm

[OlivierCazade]

/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: OlivierCazade

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [OlivierCazade]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment