Skip to content

Conversation

@itsalam
Copy link

@itsalam itsalam commented Aug 14, 2023

☕️ Reasoning

  • #8125
  • Email Provider should be used for consistensy and should be included in documentation
  • Id field should be provided as a parameter to the Email Provider class

🧢 Checklist

  • Documentation
  • Tests
  • Ready to be merged

🎫 Affected issues

Fixes: #8125

📌 Resources

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 14, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
auth-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Aug 14, 2023 7:26pm
1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
next-auth-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Aug 14, 2023 7:26pm

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 14, 2023

@itsalam is attempting to deploy a commit to the authjs Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@balazsorban44
Copy link
Member

Thanks, but this is on purpose to avoid importing nodemailer via the default Email provider. In the future, we might have more specific email type provides like SendGridProvider instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core Refers to `@auth/core` providers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

HTTP-based email provider: type "email" is not assignable to type "oauth" | "credentials"

2 participants