Consider splitting quarto reports into QC and results

[grst]

Description of feature

I feel the current quarto report addresses two different audiences:

1. the bioinformatician who can assess the more technical information and QC metrics (e.g. was sample normalization appropriate, PCA, ...)
2. the molecular biologists interpreting the results (list of DE genes, pathway scores etc)

IMO it would make sense splitting the report avoid overloading users with information to reduce the size of individual reports #106