Add sylph/profile module

[sofstam]

PR checklist

Moves the local module sylph/profile to nf-core modules. Closes nf-core/seqinspector#65
Removes unnecessary pattern from sylph/sketch meta file.

• This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
• If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
• If you've added a new tool - have you followed the module conventions in the contribution docs
• If necessary, include test data in your PR.
• Remove all TODO statements.
• Emit the versions.yml file.
• Follow the naming conventions.
• Follow the parameters requirements.
• Follow the input/output options guidelines.
• Add a resource label
• Use BioConda and BioContainers if possible to fulfil software requirements.
• Ensure that the test works with either Docker / Singularity. Conda CI tests can be quite flaky:
  • For modules:
    • nf-core modules test <MODULE> --profile docker
    • nf-core modules test <MODULE> --profile singularity
    • nf-core modules test <MODULE> --profile conda
  • For subworkflows:
    • nf-core subworkflows test <SUBWORKFLOW> --profile docker
    • nf-core subworkflows test <SUBWORKFLOW> --profile singularity
    • nf-core subworkflows test <SUBWORKFLOW> --profile conda

[famosab]

Suggested to be a bit more specific about the created csv :)

[SPPearce]

@sofstam , do you need a hand to get this finished off?

[sofstam]

@SPPearce Was on holidays, looking at the comments now :)

[sofstam]

@famosab The tests are passing now

[famosab]

Looks good, was just wondering why you removed the { assert process.success }, statements from the nf-test. I would add it back in and then approve this :)

[mahesh-panchal]

Few small things still, but otherwise fine by me
The options should also be -- format, but -t doesn't have one it seems.

[SPPearce]

@mashehu , do you want the change to the get-shards action to be merged in?

[famosab]

LGTM 🚀

[sofstam]

@SPPearce I will wait with merging then.