Skip to content

Conversation

@FinnWard
Copy link
Contributor

@FinnWard FinnWard commented Nov 7, 2025

No description provided.

@FinnWard FinnWard requested a review from a team as a code owner November 7, 2025 12:00
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 7, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
themes Ready Ready Preview Comment Nov 7, 2025 0:03am

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 7, 2025

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.51%. Comparing base (927bfed) to head (639a237).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1196   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.51%   89.51%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines        1392     1392           
  Branches      185      174   -11     
=======================================
  Hits         1246     1246           
  Misses        145      145           
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@eslook eslook added the do not merge Pull requests that should not be merged just yet label Nov 28, 2025
@eslook
Copy link
Contributor

eslook commented Nov 28, 2025

Heb deze op do not merge gezet. Klopt toch? De CSS contamination moet eerst opgelost worden?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do not merge Pull requests that should not be merged just yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants