Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update 68.md with NIP-22 comments for replies #1689

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alltheseas
Copy link
Contributor

added reference and link to NIP-22 comments for replies for kind 20 feeds

added reference and link to NIP-22  comments for replies
@vitorpamplona
Copy link
Collaborator

Ack

@kehiy
Copy link
Contributor

kehiy commented Jan 15, 2025

isn't that obvious? i think we need to talk about mentions reactions, replies, reposts, zaps, and more only in cases where someone needs to take different actions. what do you think?

@alltheseas
Copy link
Contributor Author

alltheseas commented Jan 15, 2025

isn't that obvious?

Pablo asked the same question.

Thinking through the lens of a new to nostr dev: is the expectation that a new dev needs to read all NIPs before coding an app?

Say the dev wants to build Instagram picture first app, and only reads NIP-68, and NIP-01. How does the dev know to add NIP-22 comments to a kind-20 feed?

@kehiy
Copy link
Contributor

kehiy commented Jan 15, 2025

How does the dev know to add NIP-22 comments to a kind-20 feed?

i may say we can expect them to check: is there any standard way to implement for example replies? then they check this repo for this.

but i agree that this would be easier. if we want to do this. my suggestion is to add a new section at the end of all nips and link them to this stuff. for example replies based on nip-22, it requires nip-x, and so on.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants