nrf_security: CRACEN: Added support for PKE memory clear.

[andrei-hadadea]

Added support for PKE memory clear in CRACEN.

Jira: NCSDK-36624

[NordicBuilder]

CI Information

^{To view the history of this post, click the 'edited' button above}
Build number: 28

Inputs:

Sources:

sdk-nrf: PR head: 85e1662af09c2eb4a3e9b9bcfc428d762d54331d

more details

sdk-nrf:

PR head: 85e1662af09c2eb4a3e9b9bcfc428d762d54331d
merge base: 5c4e352fbbff14b2caa2990a9e51c9774e0ba2f2
target head (main): 69b449deef77c1c56510a8caada06b3e374e6668
Diff

Github labels

Enabled	Name	Description
	ci-disabled	Disable the ci execution
	ci-all-test	Run all of ci, no test spec filtering will be done
	ci-force-downstream	Force execution of downstream even if twister fails
	ci-run-twister	Force run twister
	ci-run-zephyr-twister	Force run zephyr twister

List of changed files detected by CI (5)

subsys
│  ├── nrf_security
│  │  ├── src
│  │  │  ├── drivers
│  │  │  │  ├── cracen
│  │  │  │  │  ├── silexpk
│  │  │  │  │  │  ├── include
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── silexpk
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── cmddefs
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │ modmath.h
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │ core.h
│  │  │  │  │  │  ├── target
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── baremetal_ba414e_with_ik
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │ pk_baremetal.c
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── hw
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── ba414
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── cmddefs_modmath.c
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │ regs_commands.h

Outputs:

Toolchain

Version: 400c6cb4ec
Build docker image: docker-dtr.nordicsemi.no/sw-production/ncs-build:400c6cb4ec_5ea73affbf

Test Spec & Results: ✅ Success; ❌ Failure; 🟠 Queued; 🟡 Progress; ◻️ Skipped; ⚠️ Quarantine

• ◻️ Toolchain - Skipped: existing toolchain is used
• ❌ Build twister
  • sdk-nrf test count: 2602
• ❌ Integration tests
  • ❌ test_ble_nrf_config
  • ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-chip
  • ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_cloud
  • ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf_crypto
  • ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-rs
  • ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-tfm
  • ❌ test-sdk-find-my
  • ❌ test-sdk-mcuboot
  • ❌ test-sdk-dfu

Disabled integration tests

• • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf_lrcs_mosh
  • desktop52_verification
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_mesh
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_samples
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-fem
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nfc
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_libmodem-nrf
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_lwm2m
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_samples
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_thingy91
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_zephyr_lwm2m
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-ps-main
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-rpc
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-thread-main
  • test-low-level
  • test-sdk-audio
  • test-sdk-wifi
  • test-secdom-samples-public

Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the CI

[degjorva]

Minor question, but looks good

[degjorva]

Should this return an error? I don't know if this command can fail or not

[frkv]

Still LGTM (with polling instead of IRQ)

[degjorva]

Might possibly still need to use polling, but we will see what CI says