-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 751
Update soc nordic test spec #3672
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update soc nordic test spec #3672
Conversation
Automatically created by action-manifest-pr GH action from PR: nrfconnect/sdk-zephyr#3672 Signed-off-by: Nordic Builder <[email protected]>
| - any: | ||
| - "soc/nordic/**/*" | ||
| - "!soc/nordic/nrf51*" | ||
| - "!soc/nordic/nrf52*" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why we want to remove validating nrf52 series?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking at execution of downstream, only L15 and LM20 are tested, none of nrf52, thus there is no point to trigger it for such changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a task stating to remove all 51 52 53 and 91 validation? If there is no, please create a task in Jira. We need a clear requirement before they are removed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking at execution of downstream, only L15 and LM20 are tested, none of nrf52, thus there is no point to trigger it for such changes.
It was mentioned to stop testing 52 from next LTS, but we should keep 52 testing for some relative time. Do you want to remove 52 now or when it is supposed to be stopped with testing.
Also is 53 supposed to be removed as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I am just looking at boards which are actually used by integration CI - I remove those not used by specific downstream.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@guwa It is just integration scope, not affecting testing in general.
Already talked with @rugeGerritsen, will keep nrf52 and nrf53.
doublemis1
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
rugeGerritsen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Two changes needed:
- For Bluetooth tests we should not remove triggering CI on these platforms.
- The commit message needs to contain a reason for why testing is disabled.
nrf-squash! [nrf noup] ci: add .github/test-spec.yml More granular at soc. Signed-off-by: Piotr Kosycarz <[email protected]>
nrf-squash! [nrf noup] ci: add .github/test-spec.yml More granular at soc. Signed-off-by: Piotr Kosycarz <[email protected]>
nrf-squash! [nrf noup] ci: add .github/test-spec.yml More granular at soc. Signed-off-by: Piotr Kosycarz <[email protected]>
nrf-squash! [nrf noup] ci: add .github/test-spec.yml More granular at soc. Signed-off-by: Piotr Kosycarz <[email protected]>
d19a9fd to
687777a
Compare
Updated. |
Automatically created by action-manifest-pr GH action from PR: nrfconnect/sdk-zephyr#3672 Signed-off-by: Nordic Builder <[email protected]>
Would you mind updating the commit message to state: test-ble is not validating nrf51 and nrf91, so it does not make sense to trigger ci on these changes |
nrf-squash! [nrf noup] ci: add .github/test-spec.yml More granular at soc. test-ble is not validating nrf51 and nrf91, so it does not make sense to trigger ci on these changes. Signed-off-by: Piotr Kosycarz <[email protected]>
687777a to
61c8d42
Compare
Done, thanks :) |
Automatically created by action-manifest-pr GH action from PR: nrfconnect/sdk-zephyr#3672 Signed-off-by: Nordic Builder <[email protected]>
rugeGerritsen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed Bluetooth testing
Automatically created by action-manifest-pr GH action from PR: nrfconnect/sdk-zephyr#3672 Signed-off-by: Nordic Builder <[email protected]>
Automatically created by action-manifest-pr GH action from PR: nrfconnect/sdk-zephyr#3672 Signed-off-by: Nordic Builder <[email protected]>
No description provided.