Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix stale clocked header references when making edits to headers #759

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

ReeceStevens
Copy link
Contributor

@ReeceStevens ReeceStevens commented Jun 16, 2024

Hi all! Thanks for the development of such a useful tool! I've been a happy user of nvim-orgmode for quite some time now.

I use the clocking functionality frequently in nvim-orgmode, as I've written a custom plugin for exporting the clock reports as timesheets for my work. I noticed that after a substantial refactor change for nvim-orgmode got merged into master, I would frequently experience file corruption when trying to clock in a new header. I figured out after some experimentation that this was happening whenever I was editing a file such that the currently clocked in header moved positions in the buffer. It looks like the currently clocked-in header is stored in memory, but for certain conditions the actual position of the header would get out of sync (e.g., if I moved another header above the currently clocked-in one).

This was a pretty significant issue for my workflow, so I went ahead and patched it locally and put together a unit test case which exercises the issue. My fix for this issue was to force a reload of the relevant files when performing clock-in or clock-out to ensure the right header position was used.

You can apply just the first commit of the test case and see the test fail against master, then apply the fix and see the test pass.

I'm happy to follow up with requests for changes or feedback if necessary. Thanks!

@kristijanhusak
Copy link
Member

The solution looks ok, but I think there might be a simpler and less "heavy" solution.
Would it work if there would be a BufWritePost *.org autocmd that would reload the clocked headline? Basically, after every write it would do the check. In your example, once you move the headline to another place and write the file, it would automatically update.
There was also a plan to run a 1 minute timer to do this automatically, but I think the BufWritePost should cover most of the issues.

Without this update, certain changes to the buffer would not be
reflected in the `self.clocked_headline` attribute. This could cause
changes such as the auto-clock-out of a previously clocked header to be
inserted in the wrong location, corrupting the file.
@ReeceStevens
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kristijanhusak thanks for your response. Sorry it took me so long to get back to you, but my son was recently born so I've had my hands full :) I've rebased onto the current master branch. I'll need to do a bit of tweaking to my tests after the removal of the orgmode.parser.files api, so I'll push that up when I have some time.

Would it work if there would be a BufWritePost *.org autocmd that would reload the clocked headline?

The issue I see with this approach is that things would still get out of sync if the buffer wasn't yet written to disk. In particular, this happens when you use the default <leader>oxi keybinding on a header to clock something in-- it will update the logbook with the clock, but it won't write the buffer to save. Even beyond this scenario, I would imagine that generally we want actions on the buffer to be consistent with the current state of the buffer, whether it's been written to disk or not.

One solution would be to update all clock-modifying actions (or any property-editing actions for that matter) to write the buffer to file after the update. However, if we're taking that approach, it seems like this solution would be just as heavy (or even a bit heavier) than the currently proposed solution-- we'd still be updating the clocked header every time, and we'd also be writing to disk every time.

Based on this, I think the proposed approach would probably be the lightest approach that still guarantees the clock actions are consistent with the current state of the buffer. Do you agree with this assessment, or would you like to take a different approach?

@seflue
Copy link
Contributor

seflue commented Oct 19, 2024

@kristijanhusak Any news on this? I actually checked out the branch on my machine and played with it compared with it in comparison to master. It actually resolves a lot of problems with clocking I tracked on my own and makes the feature much more reliable. If you don't have very strong concerns against the current implementation, I would really appreciate to see this merged - improvements can be always made later on.

The tests fail happens in hyperlink tests, which don't seem to be related with the change, but I'm currently not deeply enough involved in the code to actually understand, what the issue is:

Scheduling: tests/plenary/org/hyperlinks/link_spec.lua
Error detected while processing command line:
E5108: Error executing lua ...gmode/tests/.deps/plugins/plenary/lua/plenary/busted.lua:268: ...r/work/orgmode/orgmode/tests/plenary/clock/init_spec.lua:3: module 'orgmode.parser.files' not found:
	no field package.preload['orgmode.parser.files']
	no file './orgmode/parser/files.lua'
	no file '/home/runner/work/neovim/neovim/.deps/usr/share/luajit-2.1/orgmode/parser/files.lua'
	no file '/usr/local/share/lua/5.1/orgmode/parser/files.lua'
	no file '/usr/local/share/lua/5.1/orgmode/parser/files/init.lua'
	no file '/home/runner/work/neovim/neovim/.deps/usr/share/lua/5.1/orgmode/parser/files.lua'
	no file '/home/runner/work/neovim/neovim/.deps/usr/share/lua/5.1/orgmode/parser/files/init.lua'
	no file './orgmode/parser/files.so'
	no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/orgmode/parser/files.so'
	no file '/home/runner/work/neovim/neovim/.deps/usr/lib/lua/5.1/orgmode/parser/files.so'
	no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/loadall.so'
	no file './orgmode.so'
	no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/orgmode.so'
	no file '/home/runner/work/neovim/neovim/.deps/usr/lib/lua/5.1/orgmode.so'
	no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/loadall.so'
stack traceback:
	[builtin#36]: at 0x559d5f5aa660
	...gmode/tests/.deps/plugins/plenary/lua/plenary/busted.lua:268: in function 'run'
	[string ":lua"]:1: in main chunkVim: Caught deadly signal 'SIGTERM'

Vim: Finished.

========================================	
Testing: 	/home/runner/work/orgmode/orgmode/tests/plenary/clock/init_spec.lua	
Scheduling: tests/plenary/org/hyperlinks/url_spec.lua

Copy link
Member

@kristijanhusak kristijanhusak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm ok with leaving this update on all methods except get_statusline. Statusline function is called a lot, and this update is a bit heavy, especially if user has a lot of files/headlines.

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
local OrgFiles = require('orgmode.files')
local OrgFile = require('orgmode.files.file')
local Files = require('orgmode.parser.files')
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file no longer exists, it was refactored to a different structure. You can check other tests how to set up your tests.

@ReeceStevens
Copy link
Contributor Author

ReeceStevens commented Oct 26, 2024

@kristijanhusak I've removed the refresh on the get_statusline function and updated the tests. Seems like the 0.10.2 test check is failing due to an updated clock timestamp (might have been a test execution on a minute boundary that caused that test to fail?), and a lot of stuff is failing on nightly that seems unrelated to these changes. I don't see an option to retry the 0.10.2 test but I suspect it will pass if re-run.

Copy link
Member

@kristijanhusak kristijanhusak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but I dont think we need that test.

return OrgFile.load(filename):wait()
end

it('should properly close out an existing clock when clocking in a new headline', function()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this test is not needed. We already have a similar one. If you want to test some scenario that is not tested you can add a test to that linked file.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kristijanhusak could you please point me to the existing test that is similar? I am not familiar with all the test files so some guidance would be appreciated. This test fails without the patch proposed here, so it does seem to be testing something the other tests are not covering-- keeping the currently clocked header up-to-date as the buffer changes.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah ok, it's not the same. I didn't notice that you are editing file before clocking in/out.
Please move this test into https://github.com/nvim-orgmode/orgmode/blob/master/tests/plenary/ui/clock_spec.lua and adapt the setup around it. For example, you shouldn't do OrgFiles:new directly.

@ReeceStevens
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kristijanhusak thanks for the feedback. I've moved the new test into the clock UI test module and removed the direct calling of OrgFiles:new. I believe this is ready for your review.

Copy link
Member

@kristijanhusak kristijanhusak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks!

@kristijanhusak kristijanhusak merged commit fafb8f1 into nvim-orgmode:master Nov 5, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@seflue
Copy link
Contributor

seflue commented Nov 10, 2024

Thanks @ReeceStevens, this fixes a problem, which annoyed me for quite a long time! 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants