Conversation
WalkthroughAdds a new public method Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
actor Caller
participant List as List
participant Skip as skip(index)
participant Rec as rec-skip
Caller->>List: skip(index)
activate List
List->>Skip: validate index
alt index < 0
Skip-->>Caller: error "Can't skip negative number of elements: %d"
else index == 0
Skip-->>Caller: original list
else index > 0
Skip->>Rec: rec-skip(origin, tup, index)
loop while index > 0 and elements remain
Rec->>Rec: advance origin/tup, decrement index
end
alt elements remain
Rec-->>Skip: remaining tail
else no elements
Rec-->>Skip: empty list
end
Skip-->>Caller: result list
end
deactivate List
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (9)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
🚀 Performance AnalysisAll benchmarks are within the acceptable range. No critical degradation detected (threshold is 100%). Please refer to the detailed report for more information. Click to see the detailed report
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
eo-runtime/src/main/eo/org/eolang/structs/list.eo (1)
269-286: Validation and zero-skip behavior look good; one nit.Logic for negative indices and idx=0 is correct. Minor: casting with
(number idx)is likely redundant sinceidxis already a number (consistent with nearby code either way).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
eo-runtime/src/main/eo/org/eolang/structs/list.eo(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (12)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
- GitHub Check: ort
- GitHub Check: trufflehog
- GitHub Check: mvn (ubuntu-24.04, 23)
- GitHub Check: ebnf
- GitHub Check: mvn (windows-2022, 23)
- GitHub Check: snippets
- GitHub Check: mvn (macos-15, 23)
- GitHub Check: mvn (ubuntu-24.04, 11)
- GitHub Check: qulice
- GitHub Check: integration
- GitHub Check: benchmark
🔇 Additional comments (1)
eo-runtime/src/main/eo/org/eolang/structs/list.eo (1)
803-909: Tests are comprehensive; will fail until rec-skip is fixed.Coverage is strong (zero, negative, ≥length, complex/nested, boundary len−1). After the fix above, these should pass.
|
@yarkivaev Hey there! 👋 I noticed your branch name " |
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests