-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 456
fabtests/common: minor fabtest fixes #11447
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
bot:aws:retest |
|
@alexander-sannikov thanks for the PR, it seems acaf975 is fixing #10118? |
Signed-off-by: alexander-sannikov <[email protected]>
acaf975 to
b5af7f8
Compare
|
@shijin-aws exactly, it is fixing #10118. |
|
It seem this PR breaks the AWS CI with shm provider |
|
@shijin-aws looks pretty strange. Let me check that with shm provider on my side. |
|
The error Indicate that the key exchange was not successful. The key exchange today is implemented as inband exchange. Also I see this error with It just means the recv buffer was too small to hold the incoming send message |
…lution case Preposted recieve for peer address is not necessary in case of out-of-band address resolution(-b/-E options). Corresponding send won't be issues and random message with matching tag will be consumed instead, which leads to crash or hang. Signed-off-by: alexander-sannikov <[email protected]>
e19f0a9
b5af7f8 to
e19f0a9
Compare
|
@shijin-aws pre-posted from |
|
AWS CI is still failing at shm provider |
Content:
As soon as no corresponding send operation is issued for this scenario, preposted recv consumes one of later messages with matching tag. To reproduce issue: