Skip to content

Conversation

@loganaden
Copy link
Contributor

Joint work with Keelan Cannoo, Jeevesh Dindyal & UoM RICRG.

Joint work with Keelan Cannoo, Jeevesh Dindyal & UoM RICRG.

Signed-off-by: Loganaden Velvindron <[email protected]>
@loganaden loganaden requested a review from dstebila as a code owner July 30, 2024 16:20
Copy link
Member

@Martyrshot Martyrshot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me other than some style things. @SWilson4 Do we have a NetBSD CI setup to check that this works as expected? Do we currently sanity check CPU extensions in CI?

@SWilson4
Copy link
Member

SWilson4 commented Aug 9, 2024

Looks good to me other than some style things. @SWilson4 Do we have a NetBSD CI setup to check that this works as expected? Do we currently sanity check CPU extensions in CI?

Nope, no NetBSD setup. It seems like something that would be nice to have to support ongoing work on porting liboqs to NetBSD. I believe that there is also no sanity checking of CPU extensions, though it might be hidden somewhere.

@loganaden loganaden requested a review from Martyrshot August 21, 2024 07:05
Copy link
Member

@baentsch baentsch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why did this turn "stale"? @Martyrshot @SWilson4 @loganaden ? Any interest to still land this? If so, please also update PLATFORMS.md suitably. If not, please close.

@loganaden
Copy link
Contributor Author

we need to get the NetBSD runner up. I will get back to this. I got delayed a bit. It has landed in NetBSD pkgsrc however: http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/~checkout~/pkgsrc/security/liboqs/patches/patch-common.c?rev=1.1;content-type=text%2Fx-csrc.

@baentsch
Copy link
Member

Closing after 2 more months without updates. Please re-open to re-activate @loganaden if you have time again.

@baentsch baentsch closed this Feb 25, 2025
@jschauma
Copy link

jschauma commented May 3, 2025

FWIW, I'd still like to see NetBSD supported officially. For pkgsrc, I pulled in this diff, and have been running liboqs / oqs-provider for months now. Happy to test other changes if needed.

@dstebila
Copy link
Member

dstebila commented May 5, 2025

FWIW, I'd still like to see NetBSD supported officially. For pkgsrc, I pulled in this diff, and have been running liboqs / oqs-provider for months now. Happy to test other changes if needed.

We're happy to accept an updated PR.

@jschauma
Copy link

jschauma commented May 5, 2025

What needs to be updated in this PR? As best as I can tell the diff applies cleanly on the latest source, so can't this be merged as is?

@dstebila
Copy link
Member

dstebila commented May 6, 2025

What needs to be updated in this PR? As best as I can tell the diff applies cleanly on the latest source, so can't this be merged as is?

We had hoped to be able to have some CI on NetBSD. Do you know if there is a convenient way to do that within the Github Actions context?

@jschauma
Copy link

jschauma commented May 7, 2025

I'm afraid I don't, but @loganaden mentioned that they were looking into setting something up?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants