-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 677
CPU extension detection for arm64 on NetBSD. #1876
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Joint work with Keelan Cannoo, Jeevesh Dindyal & UoM RICRG. Signed-off-by: Loganaden Velvindron <[email protected]>
Martyrshot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me other than some style things. @SWilson4 Do we have a NetBSD CI setup to check that this works as expected? Do we currently sanity check CPU extensions in CI?
Signed-off-by: Loganaden Velvindron <[email protected]>
Nope, no NetBSD setup. It seems like something that would be nice to have to support ongoing work on porting liboqs to NetBSD. I believe that there is also no sanity checking of CPU extensions, though it might be hidden somewhere. |
baentsch
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why did this turn "stale"? @Martyrshot @SWilson4 @loganaden ? Any interest to still land this? If so, please also update PLATFORMS.md suitably. If not, please close.
|
we need to get the NetBSD runner up. I will get back to this. I got delayed a bit. It has landed in NetBSD pkgsrc however: http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/~checkout~/pkgsrc/security/liboqs/patches/patch-common.c?rev=1.1;content-type=text%2Fx-csrc. |
|
Closing after 2 more months without updates. Please re-open to re-activate @loganaden if you have time again. |
|
FWIW, I'd still like to see NetBSD supported officially. For pkgsrc, I pulled in this diff, and have been running liboqs / oqs-provider for months now. Happy to test other changes if needed. |
We're happy to accept an updated PR. |
|
What needs to be updated in this PR? As best as I can tell the diff applies cleanly on the latest source, so can't this be merged as is? |
We had hoped to be able to have some CI on NetBSD. Do you know if there is a convenient way to do that within the Github Actions context? |
|
I'm afraid I don't, but @loganaden mentioned that they were looking into setting something up? |
Joint work with Keelan Cannoo, Jeevesh Dindyal & UoM RICRG.