[Do not merge] Fix error message formatting in test case#5120
[Do not merge] Fix error message formatting in test case#5120singhavnish2516 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @singhavnish2516, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a minor textual inconsistency within a gNMI system test. The change ensures that an error message displayed upon an unexpected error condition adheres to a consistent capitalization style, enhancing the clarity of test output. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
Pull Request Functional Test Report for #5120 / ea798c3Virtual Devices
Hardware Devices
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the capitalization of a single error message in a test file. While the change aligns with Go's best practices for logging functions, it introduces a stylistic inconsistency within the file, as other similar error messages remain uncapitalized. My review suggests reverting this change to maintain local consistency, with a recommendation to address all instances in a separate, comprehensive update to ensure a consistent coding style across the file.
| t.Fatalf("did not get expected error, got: %v, want: %v", err, tt.wantErrCode) | ||
| case err != nil && tt.wantErrCode == codes.OK: | ||
| t.Fatalf("got unexpected error, got: %v, want OK", err) | ||
| t.Fatalf("Got unexpected error, got: %v, want OK", err) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While capitalizing error messages for logging functions like t.Fatalf is generally good practice according to Go style guides, this change introduces an inconsistency within this file. All other t.Fatalf calls here begin with a lowercase letter. To maintain local consistency, it's preferable to either update all t.Fatalf calls in this file to be capitalized in this or a subsequent PR, or revert this single change for now.
| t.Fatalf("Got unexpected error, got: %v, want OK", err) | |
| t.Fatalf("got unexpected error, got: %v, want OK", err) |
References
- The repository style guide requires following Go best practices for a consistent look and feel. This change, while following one interpretation of Go's error message capitalization rules, introduces inconsistency within this file where other
t.Fatalfcalls use lowercase. For better maintainability, style should be consistent within a file. (link) - When a code pattern is used consistently across the codebase, maintain that consistency rather than making a localized change for readability, unless there is a compelling reason to refactor all occurrences. This principle extends to maintaining consistency within a file.
No description provided.