Updated the TCAM for invalid IPv6 test validation.#5188
Updated the TCAM for invalid IPv6 test validation.#5188keysightgems wants to merge 2 commits intoopenconfig:mainfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the testing infrastructure for Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (URPF) by introducing specific hardware configurations for validating invalid IPv6 traffic. The changes streamline the device under test (DUT) initialization process and integrate a comprehensive TCAM profile to accurately simulate and test egress IPv6 URPF scenarios. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
Pull Request Functional Test Report for #5188 / e993d36Virtual Devices
Hardware Devices
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request successfully introduces a new FeatureEgressIPv6URPF and its corresponding Arista TCAM profile, with the changes in internal/cfgplugins/dut_initialize.go being correctly implemented. A critical issue was identified in feature/urpf/otg_tests/urpf_vrf_test/urpf_vrf_test.go where the configureHardwareInit function was modified to remove the configuration for FeatureVrfSelectionExtended and FeaturePolicyForwarding. This contradicts the function's description and could lead to functional regressions if the test relies on these features. This comment is retained as it does not conflict with any provided rules.
Readme Location: https://github.com/openconfig/featureprofiles/blob/main/feature/urpf/otg_tests/urpf_vrf_test/README.md
Find the attached logs here: https://partnerissuetracker.corp.google.com/u/1/issues/415458482