Skip to content

docker-compose: speed up postgis #1122

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2025

Conversation

pjonsson
Copy link
Contributor

@pjonsson pjonsson commented Mar 31, 2025

Speed up postgis by putting the database on tmpfs instead of the slow Docker overlay filesystem.


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://datacube-ows--1122.org.readthedocs.build/en/1122/

@pjonsson pjonsson force-pushed the compose-ramdisk-db branch from efa5576 to 3af6846 Compare March 31, 2025 18:22
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.03%. Comparing base (fabb2f7) to head (17c9f25).
Report is 13 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1122   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    93.03%   93.03%           
========================================
  Files           53       53           
  Lines         7080     7080           
========================================
  Hits          6587     6587           
  Misses         493      493           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Put the database on tmpfs
to reduce IO operations.
@pjonsson pjonsson force-pushed the compose-ramdisk-db branch from 3af6846 to 17c9f25 Compare April 9, 2025 08:00
@SpacemanPaul SpacemanPaul merged commit c31294e into opendatacube:develop Apr 10, 2025
9 of 10 checks passed
@pjonsson pjonsson deleted the compose-ramdisk-db branch April 10, 2025 07:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants