Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-enable content libraries runtime tests [FC-0062] #35783

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pomegranited
Copy link
Contributor

@pomegranited pomegranited commented Nov 6, 2024

Description

Somewhere in the series of refactorings that this app has undergone, it seems that we removed TestCase from the inheritance tree of the tests in openedx/core/djangoapps/content_libraries/tests/test_runtime.py, effectively skipping the test cases.

This PR re-enables the tests and fixes what's broken since they were disabled.

Supporting information

Builds on/replaces: #35531
Private-ref: FAL-3927

Testing instructions

Check the logs of openedx-1-with-lms and openedx-2-with-cms to confirm that tests are run for openedx/core/djangoapps/content_libraries/tests/test_runtime.py. Some will be skipped for the lms, some skipped for the cms, but all tests should be run by one or the other.

Deadline

ASAP -- want to get into Sumac

@openedx-webhooks
Copy link

openedx-webhooks commented Nov 6, 2024

Thanks for the pull request, @pomegranited!

What's next?

Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review:

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:

Who will review my changes?

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/wg-maintenance-edx-platform. Tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for review.

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label Nov 6, 2024
@@ -169,8 +168,7 @@ def test_xblock_metadata(self):
"""
Test the XBlock metadata API
"""
unit_block_key = library_api.create_library_block(self.library.key, "unit", "metadata-u1").usage_key
problem_key = library_api.create_library_block_child(unit_block_key, "problem", "metadata-p1").usage_key
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pomegranited pomegranited Nov 6, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI: There's no create_library_block_child method in the api anymore -- and LearningCoreXBlockRuntime doesn't support child blocks, so I've removed parent-child relationships from these tests.

@pomegranited pomegranited marked this pull request as draft November 6, 2024 07:20
@pomegranited pomegranited marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2024 07:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants